TU Wien Informatics

Overview Professors Scientific Staff Administrative Staff Student Staff External Lecturers By Responsibilities By Committee By Name
Related
Guest Professors Honoraries Alumni (LinkedIn) #5qw

Wolfgang Dvorak

Senior Lecturer Dipl.-Ing. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn.

Research Focus

  • Logic and Computation: 100%

Research Areas

  • Computational complexity, Argumentation, Logic Programming, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Theoretical Compurter Science, Parameterized Complexity, Algorithms and Data Structures, Complexity in Artificial Intelligence and logic programming
Wolfgang Dvorak

About

My research interests lie in theoretical computer science. Find below a list of topics I'm interested in.

  • (Analysis of) Algorithms
  • Approximation Algorithms
  • Complexity Theory and Complexity Analysis
  • Conditional Lower Bounds
  • Parameterized Complexity
  • Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
  • (Abstract) Argumentation
  • Graphs and Graph Parameters
  • Answer Set Programming

Role

Contact

2024W

2025S

 

2025

2024

  • The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View / Bernreiter, M., Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2024). The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 81, 203–262. https://doi.org/10.1613/JAIR.1.15932
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Constrained Derivation in Assumption-Based Argumentation / Buraglio, G., Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2024). Constrained Derivation in Assumption-Based Argumentation. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems: 13th International Symposium, FoIKS 2024, Sheffield, UK, April 8–11, 2024, Proceedings (pp. 340–359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_19
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Redefining ABA+ semantics via abstract set-to-set attacks / Dimopoulos, Y., Dvorak, W., König, M., Rapberger, A., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2024). Redefining ABA+ semantics via abstract set-to-set attacks. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 10493–10500). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28918
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Principles and their Computational Consequences for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2024). Principles and their Computational Consequences for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 79, 69–136. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14879
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • The GSAF Solver and Verifier / Greßler, A., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2024). The GSAF Solver and Verifier. In Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2024 (pp. 353–354). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240336
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Equipping Abstract Argumentation Solvers for Verifying Negative Results / Dvořák, W., Gressler, A., & Woltran, S. (2024). Equipping Abstract Argumentation Solvers for Verifying Negative Results. In SAC ’24: Proceedings of the 39th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 762–769). https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3636073
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Connecting Abstract Argumentation and Boolean Networks / Dimopoulos, Y., Dvorak, W., & König, M. (2024). Connecting Abstract Argumentation and Boolean Networks. In Computational Models of Argument : Proceedings of COMMA 2024 (pp. 85–96). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA240312
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Justifying Argument Acceptance with Collective Attacks: Discussions and Disputes / Buraglio, G., Dvorak, W., König, M., & Ulbricht, M. (2024). Justifying Argument Acceptance with Collective Attacks: Discussions and Disputes. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3281–3288). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/363
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Buraglio, G., Dvorak, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2024). Splitting Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation co-located with 10th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2024) (pp. 41–55). CEUR-WS.org.
    Project: REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)

2023

2022

  • Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences / Bernreiter, M., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2022). Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 92–103). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220144
    Download: PDF (254 KB)
    Project: REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Deletion-Backdoors for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Deletion-Backdoors for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2022) (pp. 98–110). CEUR-WS. https://doi.org/10.34726/3826
    Download: PDF (919 KB)
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • How complex is the strong admissibility semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks? / Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Dvorak, W., Verbrugge, R., & Verheij, B. (2022). How complex is the strong admissibility semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks? In F. Toni, S. Polberg, R. Booth, Caminada Martin, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 200–211). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220153
  • Rediscovering Argumentation Principles Utilizing Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Rediscovering Argumentation Principles Utilizing Collective Attacks. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, {KR} (pp. 122–131). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/13
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard - On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility / Dvořák, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard - On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 74, 1403–1447. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13603
    Download: PDF (540 KB)
    Project: REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • Tractable Abstract Argumentation via Backdoor-Treewidth / Dvořák, W., Hecher, M., König, M., Schidler, A., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2022). Tractable Abstract Argumentation via Backdoor-Treewidth. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5608–5615). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20501
    Download: PDF (1.52 MB)
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024) / SLIM (2019–2024)
  • Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L., & Woltran, S. (2022). Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. In F. Toni, S. Polberg, M. Caminada, R. Booth, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 128–139). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220147
  • Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 140–151). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.34726/3422
    Download: PDF (277 KB)
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / REVEAL-AI (2020–2024)
  • The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation Under a Claim-Centric View / Bernreiter, M., Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2022). The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation Under a Claim-Centric View. In Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (pp. 27–38).

2021

  • Symbolic Time and Space Tradeoffs for Probabilistic Verification / Chatterjee, K., Dvorak, W., Henzinger, M., & Svozil, A. (2021). Symbolic Time and Space Tradeoffs for Probabilistic Verification. In 2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS). LICS 2021 - Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Rom, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/lics52264.2021.9470739
  • ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP / Dvorak, W., König, M., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2021). ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP. ASPOCP 2021 - 14th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, Porto, Portugal. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87227
  • Computational Complexity of Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Dvorak, W., Verbrugge, R., & Verheij, B. (2021). Computational Complexity of Strong Admissibility for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. NMR 2021 - 19th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Hanoi, Vietnam, Viet Nam. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87226
  • Algorithms and conditional lower bounds for planning problems / Chatterjee, K., Dvořák, W., Henzinger, M., & Svozil, A. (2021). Algorithms and conditional lower bounds for planning problems. Artificial Intelligence, 297(103499), 103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103499
  • On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2021 - 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, virtual event, Unknown. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/67
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / START (2014–2022)
  • The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., Greßler, A., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2021). The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021 (pp. 6296–6303). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58525
  • Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard --- On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility / Dvořák, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard  ---  On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility. In 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 6288–6295). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58530
    Project: START (2014–2022)
  • A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks. NMR 2021 - 19th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Hanoi, Vietnam, Viet Nam. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87225
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / START (2014–2022)
  • Joint Attacks and Accrual in Argumentation Frameworks / Bikakis, A., Cohen, A., Dvorak, W., Flouris, G., & Parsons, S. (2021). Joint Attacks and Accrual in Argumentation Frameworks. Journal of Applied Logics, 8(6), 1437–1502. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/138043
  • Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_1
    Projects: HYPAR (2019–2024) / START (2014–2022)

2020

  • ASPARTIX-V19 - An Answer-set Programming based System for Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J., & Woltran, S. (2020). ASPARTIX-V19 - An Answer-set Programming based System for Abstract Argumentation. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2020 (pp. 79–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.34726/1821
    Download: PDF (297 KB)
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • Weak Admissibility is PSPACE-complete / Dvorak, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). Weak Admissibility is PSPACE-complete. In 18th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-MONOTONIC REASONING (pp. 100–109). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58277
  • Argumentation Semantics under a Claim-centric View: Properties, Expressiveness and Relation to SETAFs / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Argumentation Semantics under a Claim-centric View: Properties, Expressiveness and Relation to SETAFs. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2020 - 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Rhodos, Greece. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2020/35
    Project: DK - Logic (2014–2023)
  • Ranking-Based Semantics from the Perspective of Claims / Bistarelli, S., Dvorak, W., Taticchi, C., & Woltran, S. (2020). Ranking-Based Semantics from the Perspective of Claims. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of {COMMA} 2020, Perugia, Italy, September 4-11, 2020 (pp. 111–122). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58261
  • Labelling-based Algorithms for SETAFs / Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Wallner, J. P. (2020). Labelling-based Algorithms for SETAFs. In S. A. Gaggl, M. Thimm, & M. Vallati (Eds.), Proceedings SAFA 2020 (pp. 34–46). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58209
  • Computing Strongly Admissible Sets / Dvorak, W., & Wallner, J. P. (2020). Computing Strongly Admissible Sets. In H. Prakken, S. Bistarelli, F. Santini, & C. Taticchi (Eds.), Proceedings COMMA (pp. 179–190). IOs Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58171
  • Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs Under 3-Valued Semantics / Dvorak, W., Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs Under 3-Valued Semantics. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of {COMMA} 2020, Perugia, Italy, September 4-11, 2020 (pp. 191–202). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55557
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • The ASPARTIX system suite / Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S. A., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2020). The ASPARTIX system suite. In H. Prakken, S. Bistarelli, F. Santini, & C. Taticchi (Eds.), Proceedings COMMA (pp. 461–462). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55544
    Project: DK - Logic (2014–2023)
  • Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In ECAI 2020 - 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 721–728). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200159
  • On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs. Journal of Logic and Computation, 30(5), 1063–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaa033
  • Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2020). Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view. Artificial Intelligence, 285(103290), 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103290
    Projects: GRAPPA (2016–2019) / START (2014–2022)

2019

  • Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2019). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In KI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence 42nd German Conference on AI, Kassel, Germany, September 23–26, 2019, Proceedings. KI 2019 - 42nd German Conference on AI, Kassel, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_11
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • Complexity of Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2019). Complexity of Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2801–2808). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012801
    Projects: GRAPPA (2016–2019) / START (2014–2022)
  • Preprocessing Argumentation Frameworks via Replacement Patterns / Dvořák, W., Järvisalo, M., Linsbichler, T., Niskanen, A., & Woltran, S. (2019). Preprocessing Argumentation Frameworks via Replacement Patterns. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 116–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_8
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • Near-Linear Time Algorithms for Streett Objectives in Graphs and MDPs / Chatterjee, K., Dvorak, W., Henzinger, M., & Svozil, A. (2019). Near-Linear Time Algorithms for Streett Objectives in Graphs and MDPs. In W. Fokkink & R. van Glabbeek (Eds.), 30th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, {CONCUR} 2019 (pp. 7:1-7:16). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2019.7
  • A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2019). A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 275, 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.006
    Projects: GRAPPA (2016–2019) / START (2014–2022)
  • On the expressive power of collective attacks / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Fandinno, J. (2019). On the expressive power of collective attacks. Argument & Computation, 10(2), 191–230. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190457
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)

2018

  • Lower Bounds for Symbolic Computation on Graphs: Strongly Connected Components, Liveness, Safety, and Diameter / Dvorak, W., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, M., & Loitzenbauer, V. (2018). Lower Bounds for Symbolic Computation on Graphs: Strongly Connected Components, Liveness, Safety, and Diameter. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (pp. 2341–2356). https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.151
  • Evaluating SETAFs via Answer-Set Programming / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Gressler, A. (2018). Evaluating SETAFs via Answer-Set Programming. In 2nd International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (pp. 10–21). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57479
    Projects: GRAPPA (2016–2019) / START (2014–2022)
  • On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Fandinno, J. (2018). On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks. In 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 1–27). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57485
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • Algorithms and Conditional Lower bounds for Planning Problems / Dvorak, W., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, M., & Svozil, A. (2018). Algorithms and Conditional Lower bounds for Planning Problems. In International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2018) (pp. 1–14). CoRR. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57486
  • Expressive Power of Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., Chatterjee, K., Henzinger, M., & Loitzenbauer, V. (2018). Expressive Power of Collective Attacks. Highlights of Algorithms 2018, HALG 2018, Amsterdam, Netherlands (the). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86748
  • Quasipolynomial Set-Based Symbolic Algorithms for Parity Games / Svozil, A., Dvorak, W., Chatterjee, K., & Henzinger, M. (2018). Quasipolynomial Set-Based Symbolic Algorithms for Parity Games. In LPAR 2018 : International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning (pp. 233–253). EasyChair Publications, in the EPiC Series in Computing. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57576
  • Computational Problems in Formal Argumentation and their Complexity / Dvorak, W., & Dunne, P. E. (2018). Computational Problems in Formal Argumentation and their Complexity. In Handbook of Formal Argumentation (pp. 631–687). College Publications. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/29850
  • Lower bounds for symbolic computation on graphs / Dvorak, W. (2018). Lower bounds for symbolic computation on graphs. Helmuth Veith Memorial Workshop, Salzburg, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86782
  • Application of ASP in formal argumentation / Dvorak, W., Pührer, J., Wallner, J. P., Woltran, S., & Diller, M. (2018). Application of ASP in formal argumentation. In 2nd Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2018) (pp. 1–11). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57477
    Projects: GRAPPA (2016–2019) / START (2014–2022)

2017

  • A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., & Baumann, R. (2017). A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/111
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)
  • Improved Set-based Symbolic Algorithms for Parity Games / Chatterjee, K., Dvorak, W., Henzinger, M., & Loitzenbauer, V. (2017). Improved Set-based Symbolic Algorithms for Parity Games. In V. Goranko & M. Dam (Eds.), Computer Science Logic - CSL 2017 (pp. 1–21). Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CSL.2017.18
  • A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W. (2017). A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation. In A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation (p. 1). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55700
  • Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics / Dvořák, W., & Spanring, C. (2017). Comparing the expressiveness of argumentation semantics. Journal of Logic and Computation, exw008. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exw008
    Project: GRAPPA (2016–2019)

2016

2015

2014

  • Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2014). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 206, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.10.001
  • Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2014). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. In C. Baral, G. De Giacomo, & T. Eiter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (pp. 72–81). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55234
  • Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2014). Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 269–280). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55238
  • Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55236
  • Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 69–74). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55733

2013

  • Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 114–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_7
  • Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics / Dunne, P. E., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2013). Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 202, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.06.004
  • Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2013). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. 4th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2013), Koblenz, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85646

2012

  • Computational aspects of abstract argumentation / Dvořák, W. (2012). Computational aspects of abstract argumentation [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-48049
    Download: PDF (1.08 MB)
  • The Added Value of Argumentation / Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Chesñevar, C. I., Dvořák, W., Falappa, M. A., Fan, X., Gaggl, S. A., García, A. J., González, M. P., Gordon, T. F., Leite, J., Možina, M., Reed, C., Simari, G. R., Szeider, S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2012). The Added Value of Argumentation. In S. Ossowski (Ed.), Agreement Technologies (pp. 357–403). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21
  • Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics / Dvorak, W., & Spanring, C. (2012). Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 261–272). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54496
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach / Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2012). Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach. In E. Erdem, J. Lee, Y. Lierler, & D. Pearce (Eds.), Correct Reasoning. Springer LNCS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/27624
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic / Dvořák, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. In E. Hüllermeier, S. Link, T. Fober, & B. Seeger (Eds.), Scalable Uncertainty Management 6th International Conference, SUM 2012, Marburg, Germany, September 17-19, 2012, Proceedings (pp. 85–98). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_7
    Projects: Argu (2009–2012) / Complex Reason (2010–2014)
  • Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation / Dvořák, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.005
    Projects: Argu (2009–2012) / SODI (2009–2013) / TTPC (2008–2012)
  • Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Ordyniak, S., & Szeider, S. (2012). Augmenting Tractable Fragments of Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.002
    Projects: Argu (2009–2012) / Complex Reason (2010–2014)
  • CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System. Theory and Application of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT, Guangzhou, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85369
  • dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool / Charwat, G., & Dvorak, W. (2012). dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 507–508). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54497
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 273–284). “Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications” series/IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54177
  • Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. In R. Rosati & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of 14#^{th} International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54176
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 54–64). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54155
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. (DBAI-TR-2012-78). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37418
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. / Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. (DBAI-TR-2012-79). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37417
    Projects: Argu (2009–2012) / Complex Reason (2010–2014)

2011

2010

2009

  • Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-27673
    Download: PDF (783 KB)
  • Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm. In A. Porto & F. J. Lopez-Fraguas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming - PPDP ’09. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1599410.1599419
    Project: TTPC (2008–2012)
  • Argumentation with Bounded Tree-Width / Dvorak, W. (2009). Argumentation with Bounded Tree-Width. Advanced Course in Artificial Intelligence ’09, Belfast, GB, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84891
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2009-66). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35719
    Project: Argu (2009–2012)
  • Alternation as a Programming Paradigm / Dvorak, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a Programming Paradigm (DBAI-TR-2009-64). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35631