TU Wien Informatics

Role

  • How complex is the strong admissibility semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks? / Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Dvorak, W., Verbrugge, R., & Verheij, B. (2022). How complex is the strong admissibility semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks? In F. Toni, S. Polberg, R. Booth, Caminada Martin, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 200–211). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220153
  • Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L., & Woltran, S. (2022). Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. In F. Toni, S. Polberg, M. Caminada, R. Booth, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 128–139). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220147
  • Developing the abstract dialectical framework / Polberg, S. (2017). Developing the abstract dialectical framework [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2017.47655
    Download: PDF (4.25 MB)
  • Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework / Polberg, S. (2016). Understanding the Abstract Dialectical Framework. In L. Michael & A. C. Kakas (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 430–446). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48758-8_28
  • Intertranslatability of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Polberg, S. (2016). Intertranslatability of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In Cardiff Argumentation Forum (p. 3). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56767
  • Revisiting Extension-Based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Polberg, S. (2015). Revisiting Extension-Based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2015-88). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38659
  • Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Polberg, S., & Doder, D. (2014). Probabilistic Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In E. Fermé & J. Leite (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 591–599). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_42
  • Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Polberg, S. (2014). Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In U. Endriss & J. Leite (Eds.), STAIRS 2014 (pp. 240–249). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55240
  • Revisiting Support in Abstract Argumentation Systems / Polberg, S., & Oren, N. (2014). Revisiting Support in Abstract Argumentation Systems. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 369–376). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55239
  • Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Polberg, S. (2014). Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55235
  • Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation / Brewka, G., Polberg, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 29(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2013.122
  • Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework / Polberg, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework. In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. van der Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems 14th International Workshop, CLIMA XIV, Corunna, Spain, September 16-18, 2013, Proceedings (pp. 102–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_7