TU Wien Informatics

Overview Professors Scientific Staff Administrative Staff Student Staff External Lecturers By Responsibilities By Committee By Name
Related
Guest Professors Honoraries Alumni (LinkedIn) #5qw

Stefan Woltran

Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn.

Research Focus

  • Logic and Computation: 100%

Research Areas

  • Propositional Logic, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Argumentation, Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming
Stefan Woltran

About

Basic Research in Artificial Intelligence - Analysis for formal properties of different logic-based approaches to AI - Complexty Analysis - Development of algorithms (in particular via logic- and dynamic programming)

Roles

Contact

2022W

2023S

 

Note: Due to the rollout of TU Wien’s new publication database, the list below may be slightly outdated. Once the migration is complete, everything will be up to date again.

2022

2021

  • Beyond Uniform Equivalence between Answer-set Programs / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2021). Beyond Uniform Equivalence between Answer-set Programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 22(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422361
  • DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action / Fichte, J. K., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action. Algorithms, 14(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14030081 / Projects: HYPAR, START
  • Preface / BALDUCCINI, M., LIERLER, Y., & WOLTRAN, S. (2021). Preface. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 21(3), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068420000484
  • Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting / FICHTE, J. K., HECHER, M., THIER, P., & WOLTRAN, S. (2021). Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 22(1), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106842100003x / Project: START
  • ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP / Dvorak, W., König, M., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2021). ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP. ASPOCP 2021 - 14th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, Porto, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87227
  • A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks. NMR 2021 - 19th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Hanoi, Vietnam, International. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87225 / Projects: HYPAR, START
  • Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_1 / Projects: HYPAR, START
  • On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2021 - 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, virtual event, International. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/67 / Projects: HYPAR, START
  • Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties / Bernreiter, M., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2021). Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI 2021 - 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, International. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/247 / Project: START
  • Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard --- On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility / Dvořák, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard  ---  On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility. In Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (pp. 1403–1447). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13603 / Project: START
  • The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., Greßler, A., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2021). The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021 (pp. 6296–6303). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58525

2020

2019

2018

2017

  • Merging in the Horn Fragment / Haret, A., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2017). Merging in the Horn Fragment. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3043700 / Projects: Belief Change, FAIR
  • Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2017). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5312 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
  • Ranking Specific Sets of Objects / Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2017). Ranking Specific Sets of Objects. Datenbank-Spektrum: Zeitschrift Für Datenbanktechnologien Und Information Retrieval, 17(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-017-0264-7 / Projects: GRAPPA, HINT, START
  • Implementing Courcelle's Theorem in a declarative framework for dynamic programming / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2017). Implementing Courcelle’s Theorem in a declarative framework for dynamic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, exv089. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv089 / Projects: D-Flat, FAIR
  • When you must forget: Beyond strong persistence when forgetting in answer set programming / GONÇALVES, R., KNORR, M., LEITE, J., & WOLTRAN, S. (2017). When you must forget: Beyond strong persistence when forgetting in answer set programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 17(5–6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068417000382 / Projects: Belief Change, START
  • Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. An Overview / Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2017). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. An Overview. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications, 4(8), 2263–2317. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:3-4548
  • htd - A Free, Open-Source Framework for (Customized) Tree Decompositions and Beyond / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2017). htd - A Free, Open-Source Framework for (Customized) Tree Decompositions and Beyond. In D. Salvagnin & M. Lombardi (Eds.), Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming (pp. 376–386). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_30 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
  • Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer-Set Programming / Diller, M., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., Brewka, G., & Heissenberger, G. (2017). Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1077–1083). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55706 / Project: GRAPPA
  • Deviation in Belief Change on Fragments of Propositional Logic / Haret, A., & Woltran, S. (2017). Deviation in Belief Change on Fragments of Propositional Logic. In C. Beierle, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Ragni, & F. Stolzenburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2017) and the 5th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2017) (p. 13). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55459 / Project: Belief Change
  • Expansion-based (QBF) Solving on Tree Decompositions / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2017). Expansion-based (QBF) Solving on Tree Decompositions. In M. Maratea & I. Serina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Solving Problems with Combinatorial Explosion (RCRA@AI*IA 2017) (pp. 16–26). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57127 / Project: START
  • The Impact of Treewidth on ASP Grounding and Solving / Bliem, B., Moldovan, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). The Impact of Treewidth on ASP Grounding and Solving. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/118 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Bichler, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming. In M. Hermenegildo & P. Lopez-Garcia (Eds.), Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (pp. 114–130). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63139-4_7 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • The Impact of Treewidth on {ASP} Grounding and Solving / Moldovan, M., Bliem, B., Morak, M., Woltran, S., & Bliem, B. (2017). The Impact of Treewidth on {ASP} Grounding and Solving. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Grounding and Transformations for Theories with Variables (GTTV 2017) (pp. 1–13). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57064 / Project: START
  • DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action. In D. Lokshtanov & N. Nishimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC’17) (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17 / Project: START
  • A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming / Fichte, J., Kronegger, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms co-located with the 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (ASPOCP@LPNMR’17) (pp. 1–14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57098 / Project: START
  • Towards Preprocessing for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Woltran, S. (2017). Towards Preprocessing for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning (DARe-17) (p. 1). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57058 / Project: GRAPPA
  • On the Complexity of Enumerating the Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Kröll, M., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2017). On the Complexity of Enumerating the Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/159 / Projects: FAIR, GRAPPA, HINT
  • Ranking Specific Sets of Objects / Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2017). Ranking Specific Sets of Objects. In Workshop Präferenzen und Personalisierung in der Informatik (pp. 193–201). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57051 / Projects: GRAPPA, HINT, START
  • Answer Set Solving with Bounded Treewidth Revisited / Hecher, M., Fichte, J., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). Answer Set Solving with Bounded Treewidth Revisited. In M. Balduccini & T. Janhunen (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 132–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61660-5_13
  • A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., & Baumann, R. (2017). A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/111 / Project: GRAPPA

2016

  • On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2016). On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 241, 244–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.09.004
  • The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions / Baumann, R., & Woltran, S. (2016). The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 26(4), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu010
  • Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(1), 1–25. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/149520 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(1), 27–61. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/149519 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • The Power of Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming / BICHLER, M., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2016). The Power of Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 16(5–6), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068416000338 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Belief Merging within Fragments of Propositional Logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Belief Merging within Fragments of Propositional Logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 17(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2898436 / Project: FAIR
  • Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Practice / Woltran, S. (2016). Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Practice. 8th European Starting AI Researcher Symposium, Den Haag, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86435 / Project: START
  • Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures / Dunne, P. E., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2016). Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures. In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence - 39th Annual German Conference on AI, Proceedings (pp. 271–277). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56782
  • Grappavis - A system for advanced graph-based argumentation / Heissenberger, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Grappavis - A system for advanced graph-based argumentation. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2016 (pp. 473–474). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56781 / Project: START
  • Introducing the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation / Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Introducing the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. In M. Thimm, F. Cerutti, H. Strass, & M. Vallati (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (p. 6). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56778
  • Verifiability of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Verifiability of argumentation semantics. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2016 (pp. 83–94). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56777
  • Translation-Based Revision and Merging for Minimal Horn Reasoning / Brewka, G., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Translation-Based Revision and Merging for Minimal Horn Reasoning. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 734–742). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56775
  • Revision of abstract dialectical frameworks: Preliminary report / Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Revision of abstract dialectical frameworks: Preliminary report. In S. A. Gaggl, J. C. Nieves, & H. Strass (Eds.), Proceedings of the First international Workshop on Argumentation in Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56770
  • Towards advanced systems for abstract argumentation / Woltran, S. (2016). Towards advanced systems for abstract argumentation. In M. Thimm, F. Cerutti, H. Strass, & M. Vallati (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (p. 3). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56745
  • Dynamic Programming-based QBF Solving / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Dynamic Programming-based QBF Solving. In F. Lonsing & M. Seidl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF 2016) (p. 14). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56683 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming / Bichler, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming. In M. Hermenegildo & P. Lopez-Garcia (Eds.), Pre-proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2016) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56841 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming / Bliem, B., Ordyniak, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming. In T. Eiter, W. Faber, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2016) (p. 17). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56809 / Project: START
  • Counting Answer Sets via Dynamic Programming / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Counting Answer Sets via Dynamic Programming. In T. Eiter, W. Faber, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2016) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56808 / Project: START
  • Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases / Haret, A., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1109–1115). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56772
  • Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signature / Dunne, P. E., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2016). Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signature. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1051–1057). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56771
  • Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., Rossit, J., & Woltran, S. (2016). Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In C. Baral, J. P. Delgrande, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (pp. 33–42). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56766
  • On the functional completeness of argumentation semantics / Giacomin, M., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). On the functional completeness of argumentation semantics. In C. Baral, J. P. Delgrande, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (pp. 43–52). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56765
  • Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases / Haret, A., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases. In G. Kern-Isberner & R. Wassermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Non-monotonic reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56764
  • Verifiability of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Verifiability of argumentation semantics. In G. Kern-Isberner & R. Wassermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Non-monotonic reasoning (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56747
  • ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (Extended Abstract) / Bliem, B., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (Extended Abstract). In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), KI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 257–263). LNCS/Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56694 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Complexity of Secure Sets / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2016). Complexity of Secure Sets. In E. W. Mayr (Ed.), Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (pp. 64–77). LNCS/Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53174-7_5 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Providing Built-In Counters in a Declarative Dynamic Programming Environment / Abseher, M., Moldovan, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Providing Built-In Counters in a Declarative Dynamic Programming Environment. In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), KI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–16). LNCS/Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46073-4_1 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • On Efficiently Enumerating Semi-Stable Extensions via Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). On Efficiently Enumerating Semi-Stable Extensions via Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 107–118). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56690 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016 (pp. 979–986). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56682 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming / Bliem, B., Ordyniak, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), ECAI 2016 - 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1105–1113). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56679 / Project: START
  • Beyond IC Postulates: Classification Criteria for Merging Operators / Haret, A., Pfandler, A., & Woltran, S. (2016). Beyond IC Postulates: Classification Criteria for Merging Operators. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), ECAI 2016 - 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 372–380). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56666 / Project: FAIR
  • Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In A. Darwiche (Ed.), Beyond NP, Papers from the 2016 AAAI Workshop (pp. 300–306). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56613 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Equivalence Between Answer-Set Programs Under (Partially) Fixed Input / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2016). Equivalence Between Answer-Set Programs Under (Partially) Fixed Input. In M. Gyssens & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 95–111). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_6 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Answer Set Solving using Tree Decompositions and Dynamic Programming -- The DynASP2 System / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Answer Set Solving using Tree Decompositions and Dynamic Programming -- The DynASP2 System (DBAI-TR-2016-101). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39081 / Project: START
  • Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming / Fichte, J., Kronegger, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2016-99). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39080 / Project: START
  • Treewidth-Preserving Modeling in ASP / Bichler, M., Bliem, B., Moldovan, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Treewidth-Preserving Modeling in ASP (DBAI-TR-2016-97). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39078 / Project: START
  • htd -- A Free, Open-Source Framework for Tree Decompositions and Beyond / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2016). htd -- A Free, Open-Source Framework for Tree Decompositions and Beyond (DBAI-TR-2016-96). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39077 / Project: START
  • BDD-based Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). BDD-based Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (DBAI-TR-2016-95, DBAI). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39076 / Project: START
  • Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2016). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning (DBAI-TR-2016-94). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39075 / Project: START

2015

  • Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 228, 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.07.006
  • Dual-normal logic programs - the forgotten class / FICHTE, J. K., TRUSZCZYŃSKI, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2015). Dual-normal logic programs - the forgotten class. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 15(4–5), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068415000186 / Project: START
  • Improved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentation / GAGGL, S. A., MANTHEY, N., RONCA, A., WALLNER, J. P., & WOLTRAN, S. (2015). Improved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentation. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 15(4–5), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068415000149 / Project: START
  • Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming / Dusberger, F., Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2015). Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 30(4), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv060 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • The complexity of handling minimal solutions in logic-based abduction / Pfandler, A., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2015). The complexity of handling minimal solutions in logic-based abduction. Journal of Logic and Computation, 25(3), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu053 / Project: FAIR
  • Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey / Charwat, G., Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey. Artificial Intelligence, 220, 28–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.008 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks using Quantified Boolean Formulas / Diller, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks using Quantified Boolean Formulas. Argument and Computation, 6(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2015.1036922
  • Applications of logical approaches to argumentation / Leite, J., Tran, C. S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Applications of logical approaches to argumentation. Argument and Computation, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1003407
  • Dynamic Programming on Tree Decomposition in Practice. Some Lessons Learned / Woltran, S. (2015). Dynamic Programming on Tree Decomposition in Practice. Some Lessons Learned. 17th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2015), Timisoara, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86188
  • Abstract Solvers for Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks / Brochenin, R., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Abstract Solvers for Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 40–58). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_3
  • The Hidden Power of Abstract Argumentation Semantics / Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2015). The Hidden Power of Abstract Argumentation Semantics. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 146–162). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_9
  • On the Functional Completeness of Argumentation Semantics / Giacomin, M., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). On the Functional Completeness of Argumentation Semantics. In C. Beierle, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Ragni, & F. Stolzenburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2015) and the 4th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2015) (p. 12). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56276
  • Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. In D. Inclezan & M. Maratea (Eds.), 8th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2015 (p. 13). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56218 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
  • Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Dusberger, F., Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2015). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of IJCAI 2015, the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 275–282). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56206 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
  • D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy. In D. Inclezan & M. Maratea (Eds.), 8th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2015 (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56186 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation (Extended Abstract) / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation (Extended Abstract). In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015 (pp. 4173–4177). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56291
  • Merging in the Horn Fragment / Haret, A., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2015). Merging in the Horn Fragment. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 3041–3047). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56274
  • An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation / Diller, M., Haret, A., Linsbichler, T., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2015). An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 2926–2932). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56273
  • Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. In F. Calimeri, G. Ianni, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 32–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23264-5_4 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
  • Efficient Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions Using Binary Decision Diagrams / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2015). Efficient Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions Using Binary Decision Diagrams. In F. Calimeri, G. Ianni, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 213–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23264-5_19 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • On the Parameterized Complexity of Belief Revision / Pfandler, A., Rümmele, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). On the Parameterized Complexity of Belief Revision. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 3149–3155). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56180 / Projects: FAIR, START
  • D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy (DBAI-TR-2015-93). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38634 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation (DBAI-TR-2015-89). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38660
  • Preference-Based Diagnosis Selection in Multi-Context Systems / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Weinzierl, A. (2015). Preference-Based Diagnosis Selection in Multi-Context Systems. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 233–248). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_16
  • A Glimpse on Gerhard Brewka's Contributions to Artificial Intelligence / Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). A Glimpse on Gerhard Brewka’s Contributions to Artificial Intelligence. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 1–16). Springer LNCS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/28886
  • Infinite Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., & Spanring, C. (2015). Infinite Argumentation Frameworks. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 281–295). Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_19
  • Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., & Wallner, J. P. (2015). Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 249–264). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_17
  • Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation / Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. (2015). In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0

2014

  • Tractable answer-set programming with weight constraints: bounded treewidth is not enough / PICHLER, R., RÜMMELE, S., SZEIDER, S., & WOLTRAN, S. (2014). Tractable answer-set programming with weight constraints: bounded treewidth is not enough. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000099 / Project: Complex Reason
  • Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation / Brewka, G., Polberg, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 29(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2013.122
  • Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2014). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 206, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.10.001
  • Belief revision within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief revision within fragments of propositional logic. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(2), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2013.08.002
  • Complexity of super-coherence problems in ASP / ALVIANO, M., FABER, W., & WOLTRAN, S. (2014). Complexity of super-coherence problems in ASP. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106841300001x
  • Comparing the Power of Different Semantics for Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2014). Comparing the Power of Different Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. Workshop on the Dynamics of Argumentation, Rules and Conditionals DARC, University Luxembourg, Luxembourg, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85863
  • Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks – A Logical Approach / Doder, D., & Woltran, S. (2014). Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks – A Logical Approach. In U. Straccia & A. Cali (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 134–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11508-5_12
  • Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2014). Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 269–280). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55238
  • Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55236
  • Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2014). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. In C. Baral, G. De Giacomo, & T. Eiter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (pp. 72–81). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55234
  • Abstract Argumentation - All Problems Solved? / Woltran, S. (2014). Abstract Argumentation - All Problems Solved? In T. Schaub (Ed.), Proceedings ECAI 2014. IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55232
  • Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., & Woltran, S. (2014). Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. In 7th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2014. ASPOCP 2014 - 7th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, Wien, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55222 / Project: D-Flat
  • The D-FLAT System for Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2014). The D-FLAT System for Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In E. Fermé & J. Leite (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 558–572). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_39 / Projects: D-Flat, START
  • Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas / Diller, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2014). Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas. In Computational Models of Argument (pp. 241–252). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55157
  • Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 69–74). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55733
  • Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic. In Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55732
  • Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 231–236). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55731
  • GRAPPA: A Semantical Framework for Graph-Based Argument Processing / Brewka, G., & Woltran, S. (2014). GRAPPA: A Semantical Framework for Graph-Based Argument Processing. In Proceedings of 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 153–158). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55701
  • An Introduction to Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2014). An Introduction to Abstract Argumentation. In A. Chapman, B. Ludaescher, & A. Schreiber (Eds.), Proceedings 6th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55233
  • D-FLAT: Progress Report / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2014). D-FLAT: Progress Report (DBAI-TR-2014-86). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38156 / Project: D-Flat
  • Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning / Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (2014). In M. Croitoru, S. Rudolph, S. Woltran, & C. Gonzales (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04534-4

2013

  • Complexity of redundancy detection on RDF graphs in the presence of rules, constraints, and queries / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2013). Complexity of redundancy detection on RDF graphs in the presence of rules, constraints, and queries. Semantic Web: Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 4(4), 351–393. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/155572 / Projects: SODI, TTPC
  • The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited. / Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2013). The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23(5), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs011
  • Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems / Faber, W., Truszczyński, M., & Woltran, S. (2013). Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 47, 351–391. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3991
  • Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics / Dunne, P. E., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2013). Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 202, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.06.004
  • A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming / Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 14(2), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480766 / Project: Methods
  • Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Pührer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 23(1–2), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.799318
  • Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2013). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. 4th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2013), Koblenz, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85646
  • On the Limits of Expressiveness in Abstract Argumentation Semantics / Woltran, S. (2013). On the Limits of Expressiveness in Abstract Argumentation Semantics. Belief Change and Argumentation in Multi-Agent Scenarios, Dagstuhl, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85678
  • Applicability of ASP-based Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Applicability of ASP-based Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions. Third International Workshop on Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (GKR) 2013, Peking, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85667 / Projects: D-Flat, FAIR
  • Advanced SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation / Wallner, J. P., Weissenbacher, G., & Woltran, S. (2013). Advanced SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 138–154). Springer / LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_9
  • Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework / Polberg, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework. In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. van der Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 102–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_7
  • Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems / Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2013). Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems. In L. van der Gaag (Ed.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (pp. 278–289). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54786
  • Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 114–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_7
  • Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Revisited / Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Revisited. In F. Rossi (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013) (pp. 803–809). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54784 / Project: FAIR
  • ARVis: Visualizing Relations between Answer Sets / Ambroz, T., Charwat, G., Jusits, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). ARVis: Visualizing Relations between Answer Sets. In P. Cabalar & T. C. Son (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 73–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_8
  • Abstract Preference Frameworks - a Unifying Perspective on Separability and Strong Equivalence / Faber, W., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2013). Abstract Preference Frameworks - a Unifying Perspective on Separability and Strong Equivalence. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 297–303). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54899
  • Declarative Dynamic Programming as an Alternative Realization of Courcelle’s Theorem / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Declarative Dynamic Programming as an Alternative Realization of Courcelle’s Theorem. In G. Gutin & S. Szeider (Eds.), Parameterized and Exact Computation (pp. 28–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03898-8_4 / Project: D-Flat
  • Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? / Creignou, N., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? In F. Rossi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 954–961). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54860 / Project: FAIR
  • AGM-Style Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J., Peppas, P., & Woltran, S. (2013). AGM-Style Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In P. Cabalar & T. C. Son (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 264–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_27
  • Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Puehrer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2013-83). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37698
  • Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems / Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. (2013). In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. van der Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9

2012

  • Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough. CoRR - Computing Research Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/163667 / Project: TTPC
  • D-FLAT: Declarative Problem Solving Using Tree Decompositions and Answer-Set Programming / BLIEM, B., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2012). D-FLAT: Declarative Problem Solving Using Tree Decompositions and Answer-Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 12(4–5), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000129 / Project: D-Flat
  • Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough / PICHLER, R., RÜMMELE, S., SZEIDER, S., & WOLTRAN, S. (2012). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000099 / Project: Complex Reason
  • Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation / Dvořák, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.005 / Projects: Argu, SODI, TTPC
  • CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System. Theory and Application of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT, Guangzhou, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85369
  • Characteristics of Argumentation Semantics / Woltran, S. (2012). Characteristics of Argumentation Semantics. Logique à Marseille -- Camilla Schwind à l’honneur, Marseille, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85463
  • dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool / Charwat, G., & Dvorak, W. (2012). dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 507–508). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54497 / Project: Argu
  • Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics / Dvorak, W., & Spanring, C. (2012). Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 261–272). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54496 / Project: Argu
  • Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2012). Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming. In A. Dovier & V. S. Costa (Eds.), Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (pp. 247–258). LIPIcs. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54464
  • Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Schaefer's framework / Egly, U., Creignou, N., & Schmidt, J. (2012). Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Schaefer’s framework. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 237–248). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54461 / Project: Boolean
  • Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-like Value Graphs / Kim, E. J., & Ordyniak, S. (2012). Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-like Value Graphs. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (Comma 2012) (pp. 378–389). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54321 / Projects: Complex Reason, Complexity
  • Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic / Dvořák, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. In E. Hüllermeier, S. Link, T. Fober, & B. Seeger (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 85–98). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_7 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
  • Evaluating Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with ASP / Ellmauthaler, S., & Wallner, J. P. (2012). Evaluating Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with ASP. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 505–506). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54186
  • Utilizing ASP for Generating and Visualizing Argumentation Frameworks / Charwat, G., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Utilizing ASP for Generating and Visualizing Argumentation Frameworks. In M. Fink & Y. Lierler (Eds.), 5th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2012) (p. 15). CoRR. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54185
  • Multicut on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width / Lackner, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Multicut on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width. In G. Lin (Ed.), Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (pp. 115–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31770-5_11 / Project: TTPC
  • Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 273–284). “Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications” series/IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54177
  • Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. In R. Rosati & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of 14#^{th} International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54176 / Project: Argu
  • Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Musliu, N., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming. In Y. Hamadi & M. Schoenauer (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 130–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34413-8_10
  • Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems / Faber, W., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2012). Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 188–198). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54159
  • Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 54–64). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54155 / Project: Argu
  • Belief Revision within Fragments of Propositional Logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Belief Revision within Fragments of Propositional Logic. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54154 / Project: TTPC
  • The cf2 Argumentation Semantics Revisited. / Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). The cf2 Argumentation Semantics Revisited. (DBAI-TR-2012-77). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37419 / Project: Argu
  • Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. / Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. (DBAI-TR-2012-79). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37417 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
  • Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012) / Verheij, B., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2012). Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/23575 / Project: Complex Reason
  • Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach / Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2012). Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach. In E. Erdem, J. Lee, Y. Lierler, & D. Pearce (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0 / Project: Argu
  • The Added Value of Argumentation / Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Chesñevar, C. I., Dvořák, W., Falappa, M. A., Fan, X., Gaggl, S. A., García, A. J., González, M. P., Gordon, T. F., Leite, J., Možina, M., Reed, C., Simari, G. R., Szeider, S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2012). The Added Value of Argumentation. In S. Ossowski (Ed.), Agreement Technologies (pp. 357–403). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21

2011

2010

  • Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks / Egly, U., Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks. Argument and Computation, 1(2), 147–177. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/167366 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Information Processing Letters, 110(11), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2010.04.005 / Project: Argu
  • Strong Equivalence in Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2010). Strong Equivalence in Argumentation. In J. Dix, J. Leite, G. Governatori, & W. Jamroga (Eds.), Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (p. 14). Lecture Notes/ Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14977-1_4
  • Computational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2010). Computational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation. Helsinki Graduate School in Computer Science and Engineering, Helsinki, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85068
  • Deciding Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey / Woltran, S. (2010). Deciding Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey. Datalog 2.0 Workshop, Oxford, UK, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85016
  • Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier / Creignou, N., Schmidt, J., Thomas, M., & Woltran, S. (2010). Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier. In T. Janhunen & I. Niemelä (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 117–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_12
  • An Optimization for Reasoning with Forest Logic Programs / Feier, C., & Heymans, S. (2010). An Optimization for Reasoning with Forest Logic Programs. In S. Woltran & M. Balduccini (Eds.), Proc. of the Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2010) (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53511
  • Representing Preferences Among Sets / Brewka, G., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2010). Representing Preferences Among Sets. In M. Fox & D. Poole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010. AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53441
  • Redundancy Elimination on RDF Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and Queries / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Redundancy Elimination on RDF Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and Queries. In P. Hitzler & T. Lukasiewicz (Eds.), Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (pp. 133–148). Lecture Notes/ Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_11
  • The Complexity of Handling Minimal Solutions in Logic-Based Abduction / Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). The Complexity of Handling Minimal Solutions in Logic-Based Abduction. In H. Coelho, R. Studer, & M. Woolridge (Eds.), Prooceedings of ECAI 2010 - 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 895–900). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53439
  • Minimising RDF Graphs under Rules and Constraints Revisited / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Minimising RDF Graphs under Rules and Constraints Revisited. In A. H. F. Laender & L. V. S. Lakshmanan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Alberto Mendelzon International Workshop on Foundations of Data Management. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53438
  • A Dynamic-Programming Based ASP-Solver / Morak, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). A Dynamic-Programming Based ASP-Solver. In R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, & W. Wahlster (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 369–372). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_34
  • Counting and Enumeration Problems with Bounded Treewidth / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Counting and Enumeration Problems with Bounded Treewidth. In R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, & W. Wahlster (Eds.), Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (pp. 387–404). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_22
  • Decentralized Diagnosis: Complexity Analysis and Datalog Encodings / Pfandler, A., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). Decentralized Diagnosis: Complexity Analysis and Datalog Encodings. In H. Kaiser & R. Kirner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Junior Scientist Conference 2010 (pp. 291–292). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53424
  • cf2 Semantics Revisited / Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). cf2 Semantics Revisited. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 243–254). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53354 / Project: Argu
  • Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width / Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (pp. 219–230). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53323 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
  • Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth Is not Enough / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth Is not Enough. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53171 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
  • Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Argumentation. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53170 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Brewka, G., & Woltran, S. (2010). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53169 / Project: Argu
  • Multicut Algorithms via Tree Decompositions / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Multicut Algorithms via Tree Decompositions. In T. Calamoneri & J. Diaz (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 167–179). LNCS, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13073-1_16 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks / Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2010). Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53133 / Project: Argu
  • On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics / Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Thirty Years of Nonmonotonic Reasoning (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53356 / Project: Argu

2009

  • Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae / Besnard, P., Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2009). Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae. Artificial Intelligence, 173(15), 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.06.006 / Project: Argu
  • Hyperequivalence of logic programs with respect to supported models / Truszczyński, M., & Woltran, S. (2009). Hyperequivalence of logic programs with respect to supported models. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 53(1–4), 331–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-009-9119-8
  • Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity / PEARCE, D., TOMPITS, H., & WOLTRAN, S. (2009). Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(05), 565–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106840999010x
  • Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models / Janhunen, T., Oikarinen, E., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 35, 813–857. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2810
  • Relativized hyperequivalence of logic programs for modular programming / TRUSZCZYŃSKI, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2009). Relativized hyperequivalence of logic programs for modular programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(6), 781–819. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068409990159
  • A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form / Egly, U., Seidl, M., & Woltran, S. (2009). A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form. Constraints, 14(1), 38–79. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/165275
  • Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-reasoning / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-reasoning. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 115–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_12 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-Reasoning / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-Reasoning. In A. Herzig & B. Johnston (Eds.), Proc. of the IJCAI-09 Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action and Change (NRAC’09) (pp. 33–40). ePress of the University of Technology, Sydney. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52762 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks / Woltran, S. (2009). Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks. Argumentation Christmas Meeting, Leipzig, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84908
  • Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In P. M. Hill & D. S. Warren (Eds.), Logic Programming: 25th International Conference, ICLP 2009, Pasadena, CA, USA, July 14-17, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 160–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02846-5_17 / Project: TTPC
  • ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 382–395). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_32 / Project: Methods
  • Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2009). Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 250–263). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_22 / Project: TTPC
  • spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics / Gebser, M., Pührer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 247–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00675-3_17
  • Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth / Woltran, S. (2009). Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth. In G. Bonanno, J. P. Delgrande, & H. Rott (Eds.), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (p. 51). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52766
  • A Framework for Programming with Module Consequences / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). A Framework for Programming with Module Consequences. In M. De Vos & T. Schaub (Eds.), Proc. of the 2#^{nd} International Workshop on Software Engineering for Answer Set Programming (SEA’09) (pp. 34–48). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52763 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
  • Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm. In A. Porto & F. J. Lopez-Fraguas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming - PPDP ’09. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1599410.1599419 / Project: TTPC
  • Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 241–246). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52744
  • Answer-Set Programming with Bounded Tree Width / Jakl, M., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Answer-Set Programming with Bounded Tree Width. In C. Boutilier (Ed.), Proc. of the Twenty-First Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 816–822). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52743 / Project: TTPC
  • Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2009-66). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35719 / Project: Argu
  • Alternation as a Programming Paradigm / Dvorak, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a Programming Paradigm (DBAI-TR-2009-64). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35631

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

 

Note: Due to the rollout of TU Wien’s new publication database, the list below may be slightly outdated. Once the migration is complete, everything will be up to date again.

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2013

2012

2011

2009

  • Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-27673

2008

 

  • EurAI Fellows programme
    2018 / EurAI Fellow / Website
  • Treating Hard Problems with Decomposition and Dynamic Programming (Decodyn)
    2014 / START-Programm / Austria / Website / Project
  • Distinguished student paper prize at the 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.
    2012 / KR Inc
  • OCG-Förderpreis
    2002 / Austria

Soon, this page will include additional information such as reference projects, activities as journal reviewer and editor, memberships in councils and committees, and other research activities.

Until then, please visit Stefan Woltran’s research profile in TISS .