Stefan Woltran
Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn.
Research Focus
- Logic and Computation: 100%
Research Areas
- Propositional Logic, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Argumentation, Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming
About
Basic Research in Artificial Intelligence - Analysis for formal properties of different logic-based approaches to AI - Complexty Analysis - Development of algorithms (in particular via logic- and dynamic programming)
Roles
-
Vice Dean of Academic Affairs
Informatics Master
Office of the Dean, E199-01 -
Head of Research Unit
Databases and Artificial Intelligence, E192-02 -
Full Professor
Databases and Artificial Intelligence, E192-02
Courses
2022W
- Abstract Argumentation / 184.682 / VU
- Bachelor Thesis / 184.691 / PR
- CAIML seminar / 192.138 / SE
- Doctoral & Master Students Seminar / 181.223 / SE
- Formal Methods in Computer Science / 185.A93 / UE
- Formal Methods in Computer Science / 185.291 / VU
- Introduction to Logical Methods in Computer Science / 184.766 / VO
- Project in Computer Science 1 / 184.688 / PR
- Project in Computer Science 2 / 184.689 / PR
- Research Seminar LogiCS / 184.767 / SE
- Scientific Research and Writing / 193.052 / SE
- Seminar for Master Students in Logic and Computation / 180.773 / SE
- Theoretical Computer Science and Logics / 185.278 / VU
2023S
- Bachelor Thesis / 184.691 / PR
- CAIML seminar / 192.131 / SE
- Doctoral & Master Students Seminar / 181.223 / SE
- Formal Methods in Computer Science / 185.291 / VU
- Introduction to Logical Methods in Computer Science / 184.766 / VO
- Logic seminar / 181.206 / SE
- Preferences in Artificial Intelligence / 184.768 / VU
- Project in Computer Science 1 / 184.688 / PR
- Project in Computer Science 2 / 184.689 / PR
- Research Seminar LogiCS / 184.767 / SE
- Seminar in Complexity Theory / 184.687 / SE
- Seminar of Artificial Intelligence / 181.034 / SE
Projects
-
Revealing and Utilizing the Hidden Structure for Solving Hard Problems in AI
2020 – 2024 / Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) / Publications: 147758, 147781, 147807, 147885, 147932, 147985, 148046, 148091, 148096, 148101, 148199, 148295, 148485, 148521, 148811, 148818, 148828, 148863, 148870, 148873, 148877, 149213, 154287 -
Concept recognition in monitoring data
2020 – 2022 / Vienna Business Agency (WAW) -
Hybrid Parameterized Problem Solving in Practice
2019 – 2024 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 143993, 145572, 147807, 148017, 148091, 148096, 148101, 148199, 148805, 148811, 148863, 148870, 148873, 148877, 151091, 154287, 59334, 62054, 62074, 62126, 62127, 62128, 62131, 62133, 62351, 62363, 62524, 62527, 91882, 91883, 91884, 92001 -
Compiling Knowledge into Applications
2018 – 2025 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 142607, 149198, 150035, 43409, 43410, 61676, 61733, 61734 -
Ontology-mediated Queries for Graph Databases
2017 – 2022 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 142607, 149198, 150035, 43409, 43410, 61733, 61734 -
Advanced Tools for Graph - Based Formal Argumentation
2016 – 2019 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 150001, 151087, 151088, 151090, 153177, 153180, 154710, 155406, 155552, 155646, 157071, 157216, 20684, 32681, 32682, 59244, 59296, 59335, 59484, 60842, 60848, 60849, 61095, 61127, 61220, 61259, 61271, 61273, 61279, 61355, 61663, 61665, 61690 -
START
2014 – 2022 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 145572, 145656, 150854, 151087, 151088, 151091, 152867, 153177, 153213, 153726, 154572, 155406, 155445, 155447, 155556, 155558, 155748, 155749, 157071, 157151, 157208, 159454, 159455, 159458, 159459, 160297, 161364, 161365, 161366, 161369, 161457, 184011, 42178, 42619, 42620, 42621, 42622, 42623, 42624, 42625, 58946, 59248, 59334, 59337, 59338, 59339, 59885, 59887, 59889, 59950, 59967, 59973, 59993, 59999, 60000, 60002, 60003, 60005, 60006, 60042, 60075, 60195, 60196, 60197, 60198, 60199, 60334, 60335, 60336, 60401, 60449, 60456, 60467, 60468, 60470, 60471, 60472, 60478, 60479, 60480, 60482, 60570, 60597, 60598, 60630, 60842, 60855, 60863, 60867, 60868, 60887, 60889, 60891, 60895, 60896, 60897, 60918, 61088, 61226, 61235, 61271, 61273, 61284, 61309, 61316, 61321, 61323, 61324, 61325, 61326, 61327, 61332, 61333, 61335, 61336, 61337, 61338, 61376, 61559, 61663, 61686, 61687, 61689, 61702, 61736, 61737, 61741, 61794, 61805, 61806, 61942, 62054, 62059, 62071, 62073, 62074, 62084, 62085, 62125, 62126, 62127, 62128, 62131, 62133, 62326, 62328, 62345, 62346, 62348, 62349, 62350, 62351, 62363, 62524, 62527, 62623, 62624, 62625, 62626, 91208, 91532, 91882, 91883, 91884, 92001 -
Extending the Answer-Set Programming Paradigm to Decomposed Problem Solving
2013 – 2017 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 151092, 155445, 155447, 155558, 155748, 156980, 157208, 159455, 159458, 159459, 160297, 161369, 172657, 41696, 42178, 58559, 58946, 58947, 59550, 59950, 59973, 59993, 60000, 60002, 60003, 60005, 60401, 60470, 60471, 60478, 60479, 60480, 60482, 60630, 60863, 60896, 60897, 90440 -
Fragment-Driven Belief Change
2013 – 2017 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 155749, 157287, 184011, 32681, 32682, 59237 -
Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: Advanced Tools for Formal Argumentation
2013 – 2016 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) -
Complexity of Argumentation
2011 – 2013 / Austrian Exchange Service (OeAD) -
New Methods for Analyzing, Comparing, and Solving Argumentation Problems
2009 – 2012 / Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF) / Publications: 170200, 171669, 171744, 173823, 174934, 175369, 30898, 39260, 40490, 40491, 40665, 40956, 40957, 40958, 56425, 56427, 56428, 56800, 56801, 56836, 56837, 56838, 56990, 57022, 57023, 57024, 57341, 57342, 57343, 57369, 57390, 57400, 57834, 57857, 57995, 58178, 58179, 89657, 89663, 89936, 89937, 90143 -
Formal Methods for Optimizing Nonmonotonic Logic Programs
2005 – 2008 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF) / Publications: 55966, 55967, 56076, 56077, 56205, 56218, 56219 -
QUIP--A computational framework for advanced reasoning tasks
2001 – 2004 / Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
Publications
Note: Due to the rollout of TU Wien’s new publication database, the list below may be slightly outdated. Once the migration is complete, everything will be up to date again.
2022
- Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences / Bernreiter, M., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2022). Abstract Argumentation with Conditional Preferences. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 92–103). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220144 / Project: REVEAL-AI
- Deletion-Backdoors for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Deletion-Backdoors for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA 2022) (pp. 98–110). CEUR-WS. https://doi.org/10.34726/3826 / Projects: HYPAR, REVEAL-AI
- Choice logics and their computational properties / Bernreiter, M., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2022). Choice logics and their computational properties. Artificial Intelligence, 311, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103755 / Project: SuDeMa
- Rediscovering Argumentation Principles Utilizing Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Rediscovering Argumentation Principles Utilizing Collective Attacks. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, {KR} (pp. 122–131). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/13 / Projects: HYPAR, REVEAL-AI
- Sequent Calculi for Choice Logics / Bernreiter, M., Lolic, A., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2022). Sequent Calculi for Choice Logics. In Automated Reasoning (pp. 331–349). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10769-6_20 / Project: HYPAR
- Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard - On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility / Dvořák, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard - On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 74, 1403–1447. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13603 / Project: REVEAL-AI
- Tractable Abstract Argumentation via Backdoor-Treewidth / Dvořák, W., Hecher, M., König, M., Schidler, A., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2022). Tractable Abstract Argumentation via Backdoor-Treewidth. In Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5608–5615). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20501 / Projects: HYPAR, REVEAL-AI, SLIM
- Comparing the Reasoning Capabilities of Equilibrium Theories and Answer Set Programs / Fandinno, J., Pearce, D., Vidal, C., & Woltran, S. (2022). Comparing the Reasoning Capabilities of Equilibrium Theories and Answer Set Programs. Algorithms, 15(6), Article 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/a15060201
- Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving / Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., Niskanen, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2022). Advanced algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks based on complexity analysis of subclasses and SAT solving. Artificial Intelligence, 307, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2022.103697 / Project: HYPAR
- Body-Decoupled Grounding via Solving: A Novel Approach on the ASP Bottleneck / Besin, V., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Body-Decoupled Grounding via Solving: A Novel Approach on the ASP Bottleneck. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-22) (pp. 2546–2552). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/353 / Projects: HYPAR, REVEAL-AI
- Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2022). Treewidth for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 140–151). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.34726/3422 / Projects: HYPAR, REVEAL-AI
- Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Rienstra, T., van der Torre, L., & Woltran, S. (2022). Non-Admissibility in Abstract Argumentation. In F. Toni, S. Polberg, M. Caminada, R. Booth, & H. Kido (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2022 (pp. 128–139). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA220147
- The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation Under a Claim-Centric View / Bernreiter, M., Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2022). The Effect of Preferences in Abstract Argumentation Under a Claim-Centric View. In Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (pp. 27–38).
- It Is Simple, It Is Complicated. Perspectives on Digital Humanism. / Neidhardt, J., Werthner, H., & Woltran, S. (2022). It Is Simple, It Is Complicated. Perspectives on Digital Humanism. In H. Werthner, E. Prem, E. A. Lee, & C. Ghezzi (Eds.), Perspectives on Digital Humanism (pp. 335–342). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/30705
2021
- Beyond Uniform Equivalence between Answer-set Programs / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2021). Beyond Uniform Equivalence between Answer-set Programs. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 22(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422361
- DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action / Fichte, J. K., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action. Algorithms, 14(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14030081 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Preface / BALDUCCINI, M., LIERLER, Y., & WOLTRAN, S. (2021). Preface. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 21(3), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068420000484
- Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting / FICHTE, J. K., HECHER, M., THIER, P., & WOLTRAN, S. (2021). Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 22(1), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106842100003x / Project: START
- ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP / Dvorak, W., König, M., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2021). ASPARTIX-V - A Solver for Argumentation Tasks Using ASP. ASPOCP 2021 - 14th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, Porto, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87227
- A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., König, M., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). A Reduct-Driven Study of Argumentation Frameworks With Collective Attacks. NMR 2021 - 19th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Hanoi, Vietnam, International. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87225 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Graph-Classes of Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–17). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75775-5_1 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length / Dvořák, W., König, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). On the Complexity of Preferred Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks with Bounded Cycle Length. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2021 - 18th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, virtual event, International. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/67 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties / Bernreiter, M., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2021). Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI 2021 - 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, International. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/247 / Project: START
- Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard --- On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility / Dvořák, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2021). Recursion in Abstract Argumentation is Hard --- On the Complexity of Semantics Based on Weak Admissibility. In Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (pp. 1403–1447). https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13603 / Project: START
- The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., Greßler, A., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2021). The Complexity Landscape of Claim-Augmented Argumentation Frameworks. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Thirty-Third Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, IAAI 2021, The Eleventh Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2021 (pp. 6296–6303). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58525
2020
- ASPARTIX-V19 - An Answer-set Programming based System for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J., & Woltran, S. (2020). ASPARTIX-V19 - An Answer-set Programming based System for Abstract Argumentation. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2020 (pp. 79–89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.34726/1821 / Project: GRAPPA
- Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set Programming / BREWKA, G., DILLER, M., HEISSENBERGER, G., LINSBICHLER, T., & WOLTRAN, S. (2020). Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 20(3), 391–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068419000474
- selp: A Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solver / BICHLER, M., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2020). selp: A Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solver. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 20(4), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068420000022
- On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). On the different types of collective attacks in abstract argumentation: equivalence results for SETAFs. Journal of Logic and Computation, 30(5), 1063–1107. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exaa033
- Computing secure sets in graphs using answer set programming / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., & Woltran, S. (2020). Computing secure sets in graphs using answer set programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 30(4), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv060 / Project: D-Flat
- lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming / Bichler, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming. Fundamenta Informaticae, 177(3–4), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2020-1990
- Design and results of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation / Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). Design and results of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 279(103193), 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.103193 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- On the limits of forgetting in Answer Set Programming / Gonçalves, R., Knorr, M., Leite, J., & Woltran, S. (2020). On the limits of forgetting in Answer Set Programming. Artificial Intelligence, 286(103307), 103307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103307
- Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2020). Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view. Artificial Intelligence, 285(103290), 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103290 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- The Impact of Treewidth on Grounding and Solving of Answer Set Programs / Bliem, B., Morak, M., Moldovan, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). The Impact of Treewidth on Grounding and Solving of Answer Set Programs. Artificial Intelligence, 67, 35–80. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11515 / Projects: HYPAR, HyperTrac, START
- Österreichische AI Strategie aus Sicht der Wissenschaft / Woltran, S., Eiter, T., Moser, B., Dorffner, G., Faber, W., Klambauer, G., Legenstein, R., Nessler, B., & Polleres, A. (2020). Österreichische AI Strategie aus Sicht der Wissenschaft. OCG Journal, 01–02, 14–17. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/141528
- Investigating subclasses of abstract dialectical frameworks / Diller, M., Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2020). Investigating subclasses of abstract dialectical frameworks. Argument and Computation, 11(1–2), 191–219. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190481 / Project: GRAPPA
- Taming High Treewidth with Abstraction, Nested Dynamic Programming, and Database Technology / Hecher, M., Thier, P., & Woltran, S. (2020). Taming High Treewidth with Abstraction, Nested Dynamic Programming, and Database Technology. DPSW 2020 - Declarative Problem Solving Workshop, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87109 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Computational Argumentation - Formal Models and Complexity Results / Woltran, S. (2020). Computational Argumentation - Formal Models and Complexity Results. Research-Seminar, University of Bergen, Norwegen, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87106
- Encoding Choice Logics in ASP / Bernreiter, M., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2020). Encoding Choice Logics in ASP. In International Conference on Logic Programming 2020 Workshop Proceedings co-located with 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2020), Rende, Italy, September 18-19, 2020 (pp. 1–14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58290 / Project: START
- Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting / FICHTE, J. K., HECHER, M., THIER, P., & WOLTRAN, S. (2020). Exploiting Database Management Systems and Treewidth for Counting. In Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (pp. 128–157). https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106842100003x / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Forgetting in Modular Answer Set Programming / Gonçalves, R., Janhunen, T., Knorr, M., Leite, J., & Woltran, S. (2020). Forgetting in Modular Answer Set Programming. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2843–2850). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012843 / Project: START
- Weak Admissibility is PSPACE-complete / Dvorak, W., Ulbricht, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). Weak Admissibility is PSPACE-complete. In 18th INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NON-MONOTONIC REASONING (pp. 100–109). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58277
- Taming High Treewidth with Abstraction, Nested Dynamic Programming, and Database Technology / Hecher, M., Thier, P., & Woltran, S. (2020). Taming High Treewidth with Abstraction, Nested Dynamic Programming, and Database Technology. In Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2020 (pp. 343–360). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51825-7_25 / Project: START
- Argumentation Semantics under a Claim-centric View: Properties, Expressiveness and Relation to SETAFs / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Argumentation Semantics under a Claim-centric View: Properties, Expressiveness and Relation to SETAFs. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. KR 2020 - 17th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Rhodos, Griechenland, EU. https://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2020/35
- Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs / Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2830–2837). CEUR-WS.org. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5672 / Project: START
- Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvořák, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In KI 2019: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 131–145). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8_11
- Ranking-Based Semantics from the Perspective of Claims / Bistarelli, S., Dvorak, W., Taticchi, C., & Woltran, S. (2020). Ranking-Based Semantics from the Perspective of Claims. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of {COMMA} 2020, Perugia, Italy, September 4-11, 2020 (pp. 111–122). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58261
- Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs / Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2020). Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2830–2837). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i03.5672 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- Explaining Non-Acceptability in Abstract Argumentation / Saribatur, Z. G., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2020). Explaining Non-Acceptability in Abstract Argumentation. In G. De Giacomo (Ed.), Proceedings ECAI (pp. 881–888). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58147 / Project: START
- Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs Under 3-Valued Semantics / Dvorak, W., Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., & Woltran, S. (2020). Expressiveness of SETAFs and Support-Free ADFs Under 3-Valued Semantics. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of {COMMA} 2020, Perugia, Italy, September 4-11, 2020 (pp. 191–202). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55557 / Project: GRAPPA
- Computational Argumentation - Formal Models and Complexity Results / Woltran, S. (2020). Computational Argumentation - Formal Models and Complexity Results. In Proceedings of the 35th Italian Conference on Computational Logic - {CILC} 2020, Rende, Italy, October 13-15, 2020 (pp. 1–2). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55556 / Projects: HYPAR, START
- The ASPARTIX system suite / Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S. A., Rapberger, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2020). The ASPARTIX system suite. In H. Prakken, S. Bistarelli, F. Santini, & C. Taticchi (Eds.), Proceedings COMMA (pp. 461–462). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55544
2019
- Pruning External Minimality Checking for ASP Using Semantic Dependencies / Eiter, T., & Kaminski, T. D. (2019). Pruning External Minimality Checking for ASP Using Semantic Dependencies. In M. Balduccini, Y. Lierler, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 326–339). Springer. https://doi.org/10.34726/721 / Project: IE of ASP
- Preference Orders on Families of Sets - When Can Impossibility Results Be Avoided? / Maly, J., Truszczyński, M., & Woltran, S. (2019). Preference Orders on Families of Sets - When Can Impossibility Results Be Avoided? Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 66, 1147–1197. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11879
- On Uniform Equivalence of Epistemic Logic Programs / FABER, W., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2019). On Uniform Equivalence of Epistemic Logic Programs. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 19(5–6), 826–840. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068419000218
- Expansion-based {QBF} Solving on Tree Decompositions / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2019). Expansion-based {QBF} Solving on Tree Decompositions. Fundamenta Informaticae, 167(1–2), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.3233/fi-2019-1810 / Project: START
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation / Dvorak, W., Baumann, R., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2019). A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 275, 379–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2019.06.006 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming / Fichte, J. K., Kronegger, M., & Woltran, S. (2019). A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 86(1–3), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09633-x
- Special Issue on the 10th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS2018) - Preface / Woltran, S., & Ferrarotti, F. (2019). Special Issue on the 10th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS2018) - Preface. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 87(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09667-1
- Belief Revision Operators with Varying Attitudes Towards Initial Beliefs / Haret, A., & Woltran, S. (2019). Belief Revision Operators with Varying Attitudes Towards Initial Beliefs. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {IJCAI} 2019 (pp. 1726–1733). ijcai.org. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/239 / Project: START
- On the expressive power of collective attacks / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Fandinno, J. (2019). On the expressive power of collective attacks. Argument & Computation, 10(2), 191–230. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190457 / Project: GRAPPA
- Treewidth and Counting Projected Answer Sets / Fichte, J., & Hecher, M. (2019). Treewidth and Counting Projected Answer Sets. In M. Balduccini, Y. Lierler, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 15th International Conference, LPNMR 2019 (pp. 105–119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20528-7_9 / Project: START
- Symbolische KI - Good Old Fashioned oder Haute Couture / Woltran, S. (2019). Symbolische KI - Good Old Fashioned oder Haute Couture. OCG Jahresopening 2019, Wien, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86940
- Preference Orders on Families of Sets -- Complexity and Characterization Results / Woltran, S. (2019). Preference Orders on Families of Sets -- Complexity and Characterization Results. IPASC - Workshop Individual Preferences and Social Choice, Graz, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86939
- Symbolische KI - Good Old Fashioned oder Haute Couture / Woltran, S. (2019). Symbolische KI - Good Old Fashioned oder Haute Couture. Ai / Imagine19, Wien, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86932
- Degrees of Laziness in Grounding / Taupe, R., Weinzierl, A., & Friedrich, G. (2019). Degrees of Laziness in Grounding. In M. Balduccini, Y. Lierler, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 298–311). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20528-7_22 / Project: DynaCon
- Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs / Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2019). Structural Decompositions of Epistemic Logic Programs. In TAASP 2019 (pp. 1–15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/58008
- Aggregating Expert Opinions in Support of Medical Diagnostic Decision-Making / Gangl, C., Lackner, M., Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2019). Aggregating Expert Opinions in Support of Medical Diagnostic Decision-Making. In Knowledge Representation for Health Care/ProHealth, KR4HC 2019 (pp. 56–62). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57907 / Projects: START, SuDeMa
- Multi-valued GRAPPA / Brewka, G., Pührer, J., & Woltran, S. (2019). Multi-valued GRAPPA. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. JELIA 2019 - 16th Edition of the European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, Rende, Kalbrien, Italien, EU. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0 / Project: GRAPPA
- Forgetting in Modular Answer Set Programming / Gonçalves, R., Janhunen, T., Knorr, M., Leite, J., & Woltran, S. (2019). Forgetting in Modular Answer Set Programming. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2843–2850). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012843 / Project: START
- Strong Equivalence for Epistemic Logic Programs Made Easy / Faber, W., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2019). Strong Equivalence for Epistemic Logic Programs Made Easy. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2809–2816). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012809 / Project: START
- Preprocessing Argumentation Frameworks via Replacement Patterns / Dvořák, W., Järvisalo, M., Linsbichler, T., Niskanen, A., & Woltran, S. (2019). Preprocessing Argumentation Frameworks via Replacement Patterns. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 116–132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_8 / Project: GRAPPA
- Complexity of Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2019). Complexity of Abstract Argumentation under a Claim-Centric View. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 2801–2808). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33012801 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., Rapberger, A., & Woltran, S. (2019). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks with Collective Attacks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science. KI 2019 - 42nd German Conference on AI, Kassel, Deutschland, EU. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30179-8 / Project: GRAPPA
- Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning / Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. (2019). In M. Balduccini, Y. Lierler, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20528-7
2018
- General Belief Revision / Delgrande, J. P., Peppas, P., & Woltran, S. (2018). General Belief Revision. Journal of the ACM, 65(5), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3203409 / Projects: Belief Change, START
- Defensive alliances in graphs of bounded treewidth / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2018). Defensive alliances in graphs of bounded treewidth. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 251, 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2018.04.001 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? / Creignou, N., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2018). Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? Logical Methods in Computer Science, 14(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-14(4:10)2018 / Projects: FAIR, START
- Equivalence between answer-set programs under (partially) fixed input / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2018). Equivalence between answer-set programs under (partially) fixed input. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 83(3–4), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-017-9567-5 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Complexity of Secure Sets / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2018). Complexity of Secure Sets. Algorithmica, 80(10), 2909–2940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-017-0358-5 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation / Haret, A., Woltran, S., Linsbichler, T., Rümmele, S., & Diller, M. (2018). An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning: Uncertainty in Intelligent Systems, 93, 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.11.013 / Projects: FAIR, GRAPPA, START
- Special Issue on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XIV) / Leite, J., Tran, C. S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2018). Special Issue on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA XIV). Journal of Logic and Computation, 28(3), 475–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv005
- Answer set programming unleashed! / Woltran, S., & Schaub, T. (2018). Answer set programming unleashed! KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 32(2–3), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0550-z / Project: START
- Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions with {D-FLAT} / Abseher, M., Hecher, M., Moldovan, M., Woltran, S., & Bliem, B. (2018). Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions with {D-FLAT}. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 32(2–3), 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0531-2 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Special Issue on Answer Set Programming / Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2018). Special Issue on Answer Set Programming. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 32(2–3), 101–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-018-0554-8
- Summary Report of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation / Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., & Woltran, S. (2018). Summary Report of the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. AI Magazine, 39(4), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v39i4.2781 / Project: GRAPPA
- Abstract Solvers for Dung's Argumentation Frameworks / Brochenin, R., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2018). Abstract Solvers for Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks. Argument and Computation, 9(1), 41–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-170031 / Project: GRAPPA
- ASP Programs with Groundings of Small Treewidth / Bliem, B. (2018). ASP Programs with Groundings of Small Treewidth. In F. Ferrarotti & S. Woltran (Eds.), Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems: 10th International Symposium, FoIKS 2018 (pp. 97–113). LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_6 / Project: START
- Expressibility of Argumentation Frameworks and its Relation to the Dynamics of Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2018). Expressibility of Argumentation Frameworks and its Relation to the Dynamics of Argumentation. AMANDE Workshop, Toulouse, Frankreich, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86807
- Solving (Q)SAT Problems via Tree Decomposition and Dynamic Programming / Woltran, S. (2018). Solving (Q)SAT Problems via Tree Decomposition and Dynamic Programming. JFPC (Journées Francophones de Programmation par Contraintes), Amiens, Frankreich, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86806
- Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems / Ferrarotti, F., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2018). Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6
- Two sides of the same coin: Belief revision and enforcing arguments
- Belief Update in the Horn Fragment / Haret, A., Creignou, N., Papini, O., & Woltran, S. (2018). Belief Update in the Horn Fragment. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI - International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, EU. ijcai.org. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/246
- Investigating Subclasses of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, A., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., & Diller, M. (2018). Investigating Subclasses of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of {COMMA} 2018 (pp. 61–72). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57561 / Project: GRAPPA
- A New Logic for Jointly Representing Hard and Soft Constraints / Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2018). A New Logic for Jointly Representing Hard and Soft Constraints. In Second Workshop on Logics for Reasoning about Preferences, Uncertainty, and Vagueness (pp. 1–4). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57539 / Project: START
- Weighted Model Counting on the GPU by Exploiting Small Treewidth / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Woltran, S., & Zisser, M. (2018). Weighted Model Counting on the GPU by Exploiting Small Treewidth. In 26th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, {ESA} 2018 (pp. 1–16). Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2018.28 / Project: START
- Preference Orders on Families of Sets - When Can Impossibility Results Be Avoided? / Maly, J., Woltran, S., & Truszczynski, M. (2018). Preference Orders on Families of Sets - When Can Impossibility Results Be Avoided? In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI - International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, EU. ijcai.org. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/60 / Project: START
- Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solving / Bichler, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2018). Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solving. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI - International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, EU. ijcai.org. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/237 / Project: START
- Exploiting Treewidth for Projected Model Counting and Its Limits / Fichte, J. K., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2018). Exploiting Treewidth for Projected Model Counting and Its Limits. In Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2018 (pp. 165–184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94144-8_11 / Projects: FAIR, START
- Belief Revision Operators with Varying Attitudes Towards Initial Beliefs / Haret, A., & Woltran, S. (2018). Belief Revision Operators with Varying Attitudes Towards Initial Beliefs. In 17th International Workshop On Non-Monotonic Reasoning (pp. 156–165). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57504
- On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Fandinno, J. (2018). On the Expressive Power of Collective Attacks. In 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 1–27). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57485 / Project: GRAPPA
- Evaluating SETAFs via Answer-Set Programming / Dvorak, W., Woltran, S., & Gressler, A. (2018). Evaluating SETAFs via Answer-Set Programming. In 2nd International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (pp. 10–21). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57479 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- Application of ASP in formal argumentation / Dvorak, W., Pührer, J., Wallner, J. P., Woltran, S., & Diller, M. (2018). Application of ASP in formal argumentation. In 2nd Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2018) (pp. 1–11). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57477 / Projects: GRAPPA, START
- A Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solver / Bichler, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2018). A Single-Shot Epistemic Logic Program Solver. In 11th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2018) (pp. 1–14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57441 / Project: START
- Weighted Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Brewka, G., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2018). Weighted Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In S. McIlraith & K. Weinberger (Eds.), Proceedings AAAI 2018 (pp. 1779–1786). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57336 / Project: GRAPPA
- Variable Elimination for DLP-Functions / Woltran, S., Goncalves, R., Janhunen, T., Knorr, M., & Leite, J. (2018). Variable Elimination for DLP-Functions. In AAAI Publications, Sixteenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 643–644). AAAI. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57297 / Project: START
- Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2018). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In P. Baroni, D. M. Gabbay, M. Giacomin, & L. van der Torre (Eds.), Handbook of Formal Argumentation (pp. 237–285). College Publications. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/29406 / Projects: Belief Change, GRAPPA
- Novel Algorithms for Abstract Dialectical Frameworks based on Complexity Analysis of Subclasses and SAT Solving
2017
- Merging in the Horn Fragment / Haret, A., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2017). Merging in the Horn Fragment. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3043700 / Projects: Belief Change, FAIR
- Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2017). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 58, 829–858. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5312 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
- Ranking Specific Sets of Objects / Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2017). Ranking Specific Sets of Objects. Datenbank-Spektrum: Zeitschrift Für Datenbanktechnologien Und Information Retrieval, 17(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13222-017-0264-7 / Projects: GRAPPA, HINT, START
- Implementing Courcelle's Theorem in a declarative framework for dynamic programming / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2017). Implementing Courcelle’s Theorem in a declarative framework for dynamic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, exv089. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv089 / Projects: D-Flat, FAIR
- When you must forget: Beyond strong persistence when forgetting in answer set programming / GONÇALVES, R., KNORR, M., LEITE, J., & WOLTRAN, S. (2017). When you must forget: Beyond strong persistence when forgetting in answer set programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 17(5–6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068417000382 / Projects: Belief Change, START
- Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. An Overview / Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2017). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. An Overview. IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their Applications, 4(8), 2263–2317. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:3-4548
- htd - A Free, Open-Source Framework for (Customized) Tree Decompositions and Beyond / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2017). htd - A Free, Open-Source Framework for (Customized) Tree Decompositions and Beyond. In D. Salvagnin & M. Lombardi (Eds.), Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming (pp. 376–386). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59776-8_30 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
- Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer-Set Programming / Diller, M., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., Brewka, G., & Heissenberger, G. (2017). Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1077–1083). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55706 / Project: GRAPPA
- Deviation in Belief Change on Fragments of Propositional Logic / Haret, A., & Woltran, S. (2017). Deviation in Belief Change on Fragments of Propositional Logic. In C. Beierle, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Ragni, & F. Stolzenburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2017) and the 5th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2017) (p. 13). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55459 / Project: Belief Change
- Expansion-based (QBF) Solving on Tree Decompositions / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2017). Expansion-based (QBF) Solving on Tree Decompositions. In M. Maratea & I. Serina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Solving Problems with Combinatorial Explosion (RCRA@AI*IA 2017) (pp. 16–26). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57127 / Project: START
- The Impact of Treewidth on ASP Grounding and Solving / Bliem, B., Moldovan, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). The Impact of Treewidth on ASP Grounding and Solving. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/118 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Bichler, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming. In M. Hermenegildo & P. Lopez-Garcia (Eds.), Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (pp. 114–130). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63139-4_7 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- The Impact of Treewidth on {ASP} Grounding and Solving / Moldovan, M., Bliem, B., Morak, M., Woltran, S., & Bliem, B. (2017). The Impact of Treewidth on {ASP} Grounding and Solving. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Grounding and Transformations for Theories with Variables (GTTV 2017) (pp. 1–13). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57064 / Project: START
- DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). DynASP2.5: Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Action. In D. Lokshtanov & N. Nishimura (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC’17) (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.17 / Project: START
- A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming / Fichte, J., Kronegger, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). A Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms co-located with the 14th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (ASPOCP@LPNMR’17) (pp. 1–14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57098 / Project: START
- Towards Preprocessing for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Woltran, S. (2017). Towards Preprocessing for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Defeasible and Ampliative Reasoning (DARe-17) (p. 1). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57058 / Project: GRAPPA
- On the Complexity of Enumerating the Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Kröll, M., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2017). On the Complexity of Enumerating the Extensions of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/159 / Projects: FAIR, GRAPPA, HINT
- Ranking Specific Sets of Objects / Maly, J., & Woltran, S. (2017). Ranking Specific Sets of Objects. In Workshop Präferenzen und Personalisierung in der Informatik (pp. 193–201). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57051 / Projects: GRAPPA, HINT, START
- Answer Set Solving with Bounded Treewidth Revisited / Hecher, M., Fichte, J., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2017). Answer Set Solving with Bounded Treewidth Revisited. In M. Balduccini & T. Janhunen (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 132–145). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61660-5_13
- A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Woltran, S., & Baumann, R. (2017). A General Notion of Equivalence for Abstract Argumentation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017), Melbourne, Australia, Non-EU. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/111 / Project: GRAPPA
2016
- On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2016). On rejected arguments and implicit conflicts: The hidden power of argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 241, 244–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2016.09.004
- The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions / Baumann, R., & Woltran, S. (2016). The role of self-attacking arguments in characterizations of equivalence notions. Journal of Logic and Computation, 26(4), 1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu010
- Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(1), 1–25. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/149520 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy. Fundamenta Informaticae, 147(1), 27–61. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/149519 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- The Power of Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming / BICHLER, M., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2016). The Power of Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 16(5–6), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068416000338 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Belief Merging within Fragments of Propositional Logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Belief Merging within Fragments of Propositional Logic. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 17(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/2898436 / Project: FAIR
- Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Practice / Woltran, S. (2016). Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions in Practice. 8th European Starting AI Researcher Symposium, Den Haag, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86435 / Project: START
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures / Dunne, P. E., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2016). Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signatures. In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Intelligence - 39th Annual German Conference on AI, Proceedings (pp. 271–277). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56782
- Grappavis - A system for advanced graph-based argumentation / Heissenberger, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Grappavis - A system for advanced graph-based argumentation. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2016 (pp. 473–474). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56781 / Project: START
- Introducing the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation / Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Introducing the Second International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation. In M. Thimm, F. Cerutti, H. Strass, & M. Vallati (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (p. 6). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56778
- Verifiability of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Verifiability of argumentation semantics. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2016 (pp. 83–94). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56777
- Translation-Based Revision and Merging for Minimal Horn Reasoning / Brewka, G., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Translation-Based Revision and Merging for Minimal Horn Reasoning. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 734–742). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56775
- Revision of abstract dialectical frameworks: Preliminary report / Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Revision of abstract dialectical frameworks: Preliminary report. In S. A. Gaggl, J. C. Nieves, & H. Strass (Eds.), Proceedings of the First international Workshop on Argumentation in Logic Programming and Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56770
- Towards advanced systems for abstract argumentation / Woltran, S. (2016). Towards advanced systems for abstract argumentation. In M. Thimm, F. Cerutti, H. Strass, & M. Vallati (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (p. 3). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56745
- Dynamic Programming-based QBF Solving / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Dynamic Programming-based QBF Solving. In F. Lonsing & M. Seidl (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF 2016) (p. 14). CEUR-WS.org. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56683 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming / Bichler, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming. In M. Hermenegildo & P. Lopez-Garcia (Eds.), Pre-proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Logic-Based Program Synthesis and Transformation (LOPSTR 2016) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56841 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming / Bliem, B., Ordyniak, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming. In T. Eiter, W. Faber, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2016) (p. 17). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56809 / Project: START
- Counting Answer Sets via Dynamic Programming / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Counting Answer Sets via Dynamic Programming. In T. Eiter, W. Faber, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Trends and Applications of Answer Set Programming (TAASP 2016) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56808 / Project: START
- Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases / Haret, A., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1109–1115). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56772
- Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signature / Dunne, P. E., Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2016). Investigating the relationship between argumentation semantics via signature. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1051–1057). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56771
- Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks / Delobelle, J., Haret, A., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.-G., Rossit, J., & Woltran, S. (2016). Merging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In C. Baral, J. P. Delgrande, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (pp. 33–42). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56766
- On the functional completeness of argumentation semantics / Giacomin, M., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). On the functional completeness of argumentation semantics. In C. Baral, J. P. Delgrande, & F. Wolter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference (pp. 43–52). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56765
- Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases / Haret, A., Mailly, J.-G., & Woltran, S. (2016). Distributing Knowledge Into Simple Bases. In G. Kern-Isberner & R. Wassermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Non-monotonic reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56764
- Verifiability of argumentation semantics / Baumann, R., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). Verifiability of argumentation semantics. In G. Kern-Isberner & R. Wassermann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Non-monotonic reasoning (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56747
- ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (Extended Abstract) / Bliem, B., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (Extended Abstract). In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), KI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 257–263). LNCS/Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56694 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Complexity of Secure Sets / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2016). Complexity of Secure Sets. In E. W. Mayr (Ed.), Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science (pp. 64–77). LNCS/Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53174-7_5 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Providing Built-In Counters in a Declarative Dynamic Programming Environment / Abseher, M., Moldovan, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Providing Built-In Counters in a Declarative Dynamic Programming Environment. In G. Friedrich, M. Helmert, & F. Wotawa (Eds.), KI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 3–16). LNCS/Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46073-4_1 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- On Efficiently Enumerating Semi-Stable Extensions via Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). On Efficiently Enumerating Semi-Stable Extensions via Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In P. Baroni, T. F. Gordon, T. Scheffler, & M. Stede (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 107–118). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56690 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2016). ASP for Anytime Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In S. Kambhampati (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2016, New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016 (pp. 979–986). IJCAI/AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56682 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming / Bliem, B., Ordyniak, S., & Woltran, S. (2016). Clique-Width and Directed Width Measures for Answer-Set Programming. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), ECAI 2016 - 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1105–1113). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56679 / Project: START
- Beyond IC Postulates: Classification Criteria for Merging Operators / Haret, A., Pfandler, A., & Woltran, S. (2016). Beyond IC Postulates: Classification Criteria for Merging Operators. In G. A. Kaminka, M. Fox, P. Bouquet, E. Hüllermeier, V. Dignum, F. Dignum, & F. van Harmelen (Eds.), ECAI 2016 - 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 372–380). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56666 / Project: FAIR
- Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In A. Darwiche (Ed.), Beyond NP, Papers from the 2016 AAAI Workshop (pp. 300–306). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56613 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Equivalence Between Answer-Set Programs Under (Partially) Fixed Input / Bliem, B., & Woltran, S. (2016). Equivalence Between Answer-Set Programs Under (Partially) Fixed Input. In M. Gyssens & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 95–111). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_6 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Answer Set Solving using Tree Decompositions and Dynamic Programming -- The DynASP2 System / Fichte, J., Hecher, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Answer Set Solving using Tree Decompositions and Dynamic Programming -- The DynASP2 System (DBAI-TR-2016-101). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39081 / Project: START
- Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming / Fichte, J., Kronegger, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Multiparametric View on Answer Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2016-99). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39080 / Project: START
- Treewidth-Preserving Modeling in ASP / Bichler, M., Bliem, B., Moldovan, M., Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2016). Treewidth-Preserving Modeling in ASP (DBAI-TR-2016-97). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39078 / Project: START
- htd -- A Free, Open-Source Framework for Tree Decompositions and Beyond / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2016). htd -- A Free, Open-Source Framework for Tree Decompositions and Beyond (DBAI-TR-2016-96). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39077 / Project: START
- BDD-based Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2016). BDD-based Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions (DBAI-TR-2016-95, DBAI). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39076 / Project: START
- Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2016). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning (DBAI-TR-2016-94). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/39075 / Project: START
2015
- Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvořák, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of multiple viewpoints in abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 228, 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.07.006
- Dual-normal logic programs - the forgotten class / FICHTE, J. K., TRUSZCZYŃSKI, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2015). Dual-normal logic programs - the forgotten class. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 15(4–5), 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068415000186 / Project: START
- Improved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentation / GAGGL, S. A., MANTHEY, N., RONCA, A., WALLNER, J. P., & WOLTRAN, S. (2015). Improved answer-set programming encodings for abstract argumentation. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 15(4–5), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068415000149 / Project: START
- Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming / Dusberger, F., Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2015). Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. Journal of Logic and Computation, 30(4), 837–862. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exv060 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- The complexity of handling minimal solutions in logic-based abduction / Pfandler, A., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2015). The complexity of handling minimal solutions in logic-based abduction. Journal of Logic and Computation, 25(3), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exu053 / Project: FAIR
- Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey / Charwat, G., Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey. Artificial Intelligence, 220, 28–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.008 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks using Quantified Boolean Formulas / Diller, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks using Quantified Boolean Formulas. Argument and Computation, 6(2), 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2015.1036922
- Applications of logical approaches to argumentation / Leite, J., Tran, C. S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Applications of logical approaches to argumentation. Argument and Computation, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1003407
- Dynamic Programming on Tree Decomposition in Practice. Some Lessons Learned / Woltran, S. (2015). Dynamic Programming on Tree Decomposition in Practice. Some Lessons Learned. 17th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2015), Timisoara, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86188
- Abstract Solvers for Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks / Brochenin, R., Linsbichler, T., Maratea, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Abstract Solvers for Dung’s Argumentation Frameworks. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 40–58). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_3
- The Hidden Power of Abstract Argumentation Semantics / Linsbichler, T., Spanring, C., & Woltran, S. (2015). The Hidden Power of Abstract Argumentation Semantics. In E. Black, S. Modgil, & N. Oren (Eds.), Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation (pp. 146–162). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_9
- On the Functional Completeness of Argumentation Semantics / Giacomin, M., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). On the Functional Completeness of Argumentation Semantics. In C. Beierle, G. Kern-Isberner, M. Ragni, & F. Stolzenburg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2015) and the 4th Workshop KI & Kognition (KIK-2015) (p. 12). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56276
- Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. In D. Inclezan & M. Maratea (Eds.), 8th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2015 (p. 13). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56218 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
- Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning / Dusberger, F., Abseher, M., Musliu, N., & Woltran, S. (2015). Improving the Efficiency of Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions via Machine Learning. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of IJCAI 2015, the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 275–282). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56206 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
- D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy. In D. Inclezan & M. Maratea (Eds.), 8th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2015 (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56186 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation (Extended Abstract) / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation (Extended Abstract). In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2015 (pp. 4173–4177). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56291
- Merging in the Horn Fragment / Haret, A., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2015). Merging in the Horn Fragment. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 3041–3047). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56274
- An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation / Diller, M., Haret, A., Linsbichler, T., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2015). An extension-based approach to belief revision in abstract argumentation. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 2926–2932). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56273
- Shift Design with Answer Set Programming / Abseher, M., Gebser, M., Musliu, N., Schaub, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Shift Design with Answer Set Programming. In F. Calimeri, G. Ianni, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 32–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23264-5_4 / Projects: ARTE, D-Flat, START
- Efficient Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions Using Binary Decision Diagrams / Charwat, G., & Woltran, S. (2015). Efficient Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions Using Binary Decision Diagrams. In F. Calimeri, G. Ianni, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 213–227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23264-5_19 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- On the Parameterized Complexity of Belief Revision / Pfandler, A., Rümmele, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2015). On the Parameterized Complexity of Belief Revision. In Q. Yang & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - IJCAI 2015 (pp. 3149–3155). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56180 / Projects: FAIR, START
- D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy / Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). D-FLAT^2: Subset Minimization in Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions Made Easy (DBAI-TR-2015-93). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38634 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2015). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation (DBAI-TR-2015-89). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38660
- Preference-Based Diagnosis Selection in Multi-Context Systems / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Weinzierl, A. (2015). Preference-Based Diagnosis Selection in Multi-Context Systems. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 233–248). Springer International Publishing Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_16
- A Glimpse on Gerhard Brewka's Contributions to Artificial Intelligence / Eiter, T., Strass, H., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2015). A Glimpse on Gerhard Brewka’s Contributions to Artificial Intelligence. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 1–16). Springer LNCS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/28886
- Infinite Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., & Spanring, C. (2015). Infinite Argumentation Frameworks. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 281–295). Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_19
- Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Linsbichler, T., & Wallner, J. P. (2015). Reduction-Based Approaches to Implement Modgil’s Extended Argumentation Frameworks. In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation (pp. 249–264). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0_17
- Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation / Advances in Knowledge Representation, Logic Programming, and Abstract Argumentation. (2015). In T. Eiter, H. Strass, M. Truszczynski, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14726-0
2014
- Tractable answer-set programming with weight constraints: bounded treewidth is not enough / PICHLER, R., RÜMMELE, S., SZEIDER, S., & WOLTRAN, S. (2014). Tractable answer-set programming with weight constraints: bounded treewidth is not enough. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000099 / Project: Complex Reason
- Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation / Brewka, G., Polberg, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Generalizations of Dung Frameworks and Their Role in Formal Argumentation. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 29(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/mis.2013.122
- Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvořák, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2014). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 206, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.10.001
- Belief revision within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief revision within fragments of propositional logic. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 80(2), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2013.08.002
- Complexity of super-coherence problems in ASP / ALVIANO, M., FABER, W., & WOLTRAN, S. (2014). Complexity of super-coherence problems in ASP. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106841300001x
- Comparing the Power of Different Semantics for Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2014). Comparing the Power of Different Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. Workshop on the Dynamics of Argumentation, Rules and Conditionals DARC, University Luxembourg, Luxembourg, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85863
- Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks – A Logical Approach / Doder, D., & Woltran, S. (2014). Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks – A Logical Approach. In U. Straccia & A. Cali (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 134–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11508-5_12
- Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited / Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2014). Resolution-Based Grounded Semantics Revisited. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 269–280). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55238
- Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55236
- Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2014). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. In C. Baral, G. De Giacomo, & T. Eiter (Eds.), Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (pp. 72–81). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55234
- Abstract Argumentation - All Problems Solved? / Woltran, S. (2014). Abstract Argumentation - All Problems Solved? In T. Schaub (Ed.), Proceedings ECAI 2014. IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55232
- Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., & Woltran, S. (2014). Computing Secure Sets in Graphs using Answer Set Programming. In 7th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2014. ASPOCP 2014 - 7th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, Wien, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55222 / Project: D-Flat
- The D-FLAT System for Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2014). The D-FLAT System for Dynamic Programming on Tree Decompositions. In E. Fermé & J. Leite (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 558–572). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_39 / Projects: D-Flat, START
- Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas / Diller, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2014). Reasoning in Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas. In Computational Models of Argument (pp. 241–252). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55157
- Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 69–74). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55733
- Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic. In Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55732
- Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2014). Belief merging within fragments of propositional logic. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 231–236). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55731
- GRAPPA: A Semantical Framework for Graph-Based Argument Processing / Brewka, G., & Woltran, S. (2014). GRAPPA: A Semantical Framework for Graph-Based Argument Processing. In Proceedings of 21st European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 153–158). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55701
- An Introduction to Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2014). An Introduction to Abstract Argumentation. In A. Chapman, B. Ludaescher, & A. Schreiber (Eds.), Proceedings 6th USENIX Workshop on the Theory and Practice of Provenance. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55233
- D-FLAT: Progress Report / Abseher, M., Bliem, B., Charwat, G., Dusberger, F., Hecher, M., & Woltran, S. (2014). D-FLAT: Progress Report (DBAI-TR-2014-86). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/38156 / Project: D-Flat
- Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning / Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. (2014). In M. Croitoru, S. Rudolph, S. Woltran, & C. Gonzales (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04534-4
2013
- Complexity of redundancy detection on RDF graphs in the presence of rules, constraints, and queries / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2013). Complexity of redundancy detection on RDF graphs in the presence of rules, constraints, and queries. Semantic Web: Interoperability, Usability, Applicability, 4(4), 351–393. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/155572 / Projects: SODI, TTPC
- The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited. / Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2013). The cf2 argumentation semantics revisited. Journal of Logic and Computation, 23(5), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs011
- Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems / Faber, W., Truszczyński, M., & Woltran, S. (2013). Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 47, 351–391. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3991
- Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics / Dunne, P. E., Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2013). Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 202, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2013.06.004
- A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming / Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 14(2), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480766 / Project: Methods
- Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Pührer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 23(1–2), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.799318
- Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation / Dunne, P. E., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., & Woltran, S. (2013). Characteristics of Multiple Viewpoints in Abstract Argumentation. 4th Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief (DKB-2013), Koblenz, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85646
- On the Limits of Expressiveness in Abstract Argumentation Semantics / Woltran, S. (2013). On the Limits of Expressiveness in Abstract Argumentation Semantics. Belief Change and Argumentation in Multi-Agent Scenarios, Dagstuhl, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85678
- Applicability of ASP-based Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Applicability of ASP-based Problem Solving on Tree Decompositions. Third International Workshop on Graph Structures for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (GKR) 2013, Peking, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85667 / Projects: D-Flat, FAIR
- Advanced SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation / Wallner, J. P., Weissenbacher, G., & Woltran, S. (2013). Advanced SAT Techniques for Abstract Argumentation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 138–154). Springer / LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_9
- Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework / Polberg, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Admissibility in the Abstract Dialectical Framework. In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. van der Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 102–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_7
- Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems / Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2013). Structural Properties for Deductive Argument Systems. In L. van der Gaag (Ed.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (pp. 278–289). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54786
- Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 114–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_7
- Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Revisited / Brewka, G., Ellmauthaler, S., Strass, H., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks Revisited. In F. Rossi (Ed.), Proceedings of the twenty-third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2013) (pp. 803–809). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54784 / Project: FAIR
- ARVis: Visualizing Relations between Answer Sets / Ambroz, T., Charwat, G., Jusits, A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). ARVis: Visualizing Relations between Answer Sets. In P. Cabalar & T. C. Son (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 73–78). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_8
- Abstract Preference Frameworks - a Unifying Perspective on Separability and Strong Equivalence / Faber, W., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2013). Abstract Preference Frameworks - a Unifying Perspective on Separability and Strong Equivalence. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 297–303). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54899
- Declarative Dynamic Programming as an Alternative Realization of Courcelle’s Theorem / Bliem, B., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Declarative Dynamic Programming as an Alternative Realization of Courcelle’s Theorem. In G. Gutin & S. Szeider (Eds.), Parameterized and Exact Computation (pp. 28–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03898-8_4 / Project: D-Flat
- Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? / Creignou, N., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2013). Do Hard SAT-Related Reasoning Tasks Become Easier in the Krom Fragment? In F. Rossi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 954–961). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54860 / Project: FAIR
- AGM-Style Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J., Peppas, P., & Woltran, S. (2013). AGM-Style Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In P. Cabalar & T. C. Son (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 264–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_27
- Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Puehrer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2013-83). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37698
- Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems / Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. (2013). In J. Leite, T. C. Son, P. Torroni, L. van der Torre, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9
2012
- Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough. CoRR - Computing Research Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/163667 / Project: TTPC
- D-FLAT: Declarative Problem Solving Using Tree Decompositions and Answer-Set Programming / BLIEM, B., MORAK, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2012). D-FLAT: Declarative Problem Solving Using Tree Decompositions and Answer-Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 12(4–5), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000129 / Project: D-Flat
- Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough / PICHLER, R., RÜMMELE, S., SZEIDER, S., & WOLTRAN, S. (2012). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth is not Enough. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 14(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068412000099 / Project: Complex Reason
- Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation / Dvořák, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Towards fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for abstract argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 186, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.03.005 / Projects: Argu, SODI, TTPC
- CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). CEGARTIX: A SAT-Based Argumentation System. Theory and Application of Satisfiability Testing -- SAT, Guangzhou, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85369
- Characteristics of Argumentation Semantics / Woltran, S. (2012). Characteristics of Argumentation Semantics. Logique à Marseille -- Camilla Schwind à l’honneur, Marseille, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85463
- dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool / Charwat, G., & Dvorak, W. (2012). dynPARTIX 2.0 - Dynamic Programming Argumentation Reasoning Tool. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 507–508). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54497 / Project: Argu
- Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics / Dvorak, W., & Spanring, C. (2012). Comparing the Expressiveness of Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 261–272). Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications / IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54496 / Project: Argu
- Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2012). Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming. In A. Dovier & V. S. Costa (Eds.), Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (pp. 247–258). LIPIcs. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54464
- Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Schaefer's framework / Egly, U., Creignou, N., & Schmidt, J. (2012). Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Schaefer’s framework. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 237–248). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54461 / Project: Boolean
- Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-like Value Graphs / Kim, E. J., & Ordyniak, S. (2012). Valued-Based Argumentation for Tree-like Value Graphs. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (Comma 2012) (pp. 378–389). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54321 / Projects: Complex Reason, Complexity
- Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic / Dvořák, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. In E. Hüllermeier, S. Link, T. Fober, & B. Seeger (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 85–98). Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33362-0_7 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
- Evaluating Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with ASP / Ellmauthaler, S., & Wallner, J. P. (2012). Evaluating Abstract Dialectical Frameworks with ASP. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2012 (pp. 505–506). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54186
- Utilizing ASP for Generating and Visualizing Argumentation Frameworks / Charwat, G., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Utilizing ASP for Generating and Visualizing Argumentation Frameworks. In M. Fink & Y. Lierler (Eds.), 5th Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2012) (p. 15). CoRR. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54185
- Multicut on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width / Lackner, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Multicut on Graphs of Bounded Clique-Width. In G. Lin (Ed.), Combinatorial Optimization and Applications (pp. 115–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31770-5_11 / Project: TTPC
- Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Computational Aspects of cf2 and stage2 Argumentation Semantics. In B. Verheij, S. Szeider, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (pp. 273–284). “Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications” series/IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54177
- Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. / Dvorak, W., & Gaggl, S. (2012). Incorporating Stage Semantics in the SCC-recursive Schema for Argumentation Semantics. In R. Rosati & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of 14#^{th} International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54176 / Project: Argu
- Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Musliu, N., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming. In Y. Hamadi & M. Schoenauer (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 130–144). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34413-8_10
- Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems / Faber, W., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2012). Strong Equivalence of Qualitative Optimization Problems. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 188–198). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54159
- Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Järvisalo, M., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2012). Complexity-Sensitive Decision Procedures for Abstract Argumentation. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 54–64). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54155 / Project: Argu
- Belief Revision within Fragments of Propositional Logic / Creignou, N., Papini, O., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2012). Belief Revision within Fragments of Propositional Logic. In G. Brewka, T. Eiter, & S. McIlraith (Eds.), Proceedings of 13#^{th} int. conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54154 / Project: TTPC
- The cf2 Argumentation Semantics Revisited. / Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). The cf2 Argumentation Semantics Revisited. (DBAI-TR-2012-77). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37419 / Project: Argu
- Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. / Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2012). Abstract Argumentation via Monadic Second Order Logic. (DBAI-TR-2012-79). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37417 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
- Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012) / Verheij, B., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2012). Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/23575 / Project: Complex Reason
- Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach / Baumann, R., Brewka, G., Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2012). Parameterized Splitting: A Simple Modification-Based Approach. In E. Erdem, J. Lee, Y. Lierler, & D. Pearce (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30743-0 / Project: Argu
- The Added Value of Argumentation / Modgil, S., Toni, F., Bex, F., Bratko, I., Chesñevar, C. I., Dvořák, W., Falappa, M. A., Fan, X., Gaggl, S. A., García, A. J., González, M. P., Gordon, T. F., Leite, J., Možina, M., Reed, C., Simari, G. R., Szeider, S., Torroni, P., & Woltran, S. (2012). The Added Value of Argumentation. In S. Ossowski (Ed.), Agreement Technologies (pp. 357–403). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5583-3_21
2011
- Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks / Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2011). Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, 175(14–15), 1985–2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2011.06.003
- Special issue on answer set programming / Balduccini, M., & Woltran, S. (2011). Special issue on answer set programming. AI Communications, 24(2), 105–106. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/162167
- Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Post's framework / Creignou, N., Schmidt, J., Thomas, M., & Woltran, S. (2011). Complexity of logic-based argumentation in Post’s framework. Argument and Computation, 2(2–3), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2011.629736
- On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2011). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 41, 445–475. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.3318 / Project: Argu
- Complexity of Super-Coherence Problems in ASP / Alviano, M., Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2011). Complexity of Super-Coherence Problems in ASP. Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP) 2010, Edinburgh, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85143
- Strong Equivalence in Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2011). Strong Equivalence in Argumentation. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85223
- Computational Aspects of Formal Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2011). Computational Aspects of Formal Argumentation. TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85222
- Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey / Woltran, S. (2011). Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey. In O. de Moor, G. Gottlob, T. Furche, & A. Sellers (Eds.), Datalog Reloaded (pp. 106–119). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53954
- A New Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithm for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Musliu, N., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2011). A New Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithm for Answer Set Programming. In T. M. Khoshgoftaar & X. Zhu (Eds.), 2011 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2011.154
- A Dynamic Programming Reasoner for Abstract Argumentation. / Dvorak, W., Morak, M., Nopp, C., & Woltran, S. (2011). A Dynamic Programming Reasoner for Abstract Argumentation. In 19th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2011) (p. 5). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53730 / Project: Argu
- Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. / Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2011). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In 19th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2011) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53720 / Project: Argu
- Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics Based on Conflict-Free Sets / Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2011). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics Based on Conflict-Free Sets. In W. Liu (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 38–49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22152-1_4 / Project: Argu
- Relating the Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Standard AFs / Brewka, G., Dunne, P. E., & Woltran, S. (2011). Relating the Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Standard AFs. In T. Walsh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22#^{nd} Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (p. 6). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53672 / Project: Argu
- Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics / Dvorak, W., Dunne, P. E., & Woltran, S. (2011). Parametric Properties of Ideal Semantics. In T. Walsh (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22#^{nd} Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (p. 6). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53671 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics based on Conflict-free Sets / Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2011). Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Semantics based on Conflict-free Sets (DBAI-TR-2011-68). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/36952 / Project: Argu
- Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems / Dvorak, W., Gaggl, S., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2011). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems (DBAI-TR-2011-70). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/36951 / Project: Argu
- Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., & Woltran, S. (2011). Preprocessing of Complex Non-Ground Rules in Answer Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2011-72). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37103
- Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming / Morak, M., Musliu, N., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2011). Evaluating Tree-Decomposition Based Algorithms for Answer Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2011-73). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37104
- Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2011). Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation (DBAI-TR-2011-74). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37126 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Manifold Answer-Set Programs and Their Applications / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2011). Manifold Answer-Set Programs and Their Applications. In M. Balduccini & T. C. Son (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20832-4
2010
- Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks / Egly, U., Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks. Argument and Computation, 1(2), 147–177. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/167366 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks / Dvořák, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). Complexity of semi-stable and stage semantics in argumentation frameworks. Information Processing Letters, 110(11), 425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2010.04.005 / Project: Argu
- Strong Equivalence in Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2010). Strong Equivalence in Argumentation. In J. Dix, J. Leite, G. Governatori, & W. Jamroga (Eds.), Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (p. 14). Lecture Notes/ Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14977-1_4
- Computational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation / Woltran, S. (2010). Computational Aspects of Abstract Argumentation. Helsinki Graduate School in Computer Science and Engineering, Helsinki, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85068
- Deciding Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey / Woltran, S. (2010). Deciding Equivalence between Extended Datalog Programs. A Brief Survey. Datalog 2.0 Workshop, Oxford, UK, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/85016
- Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier / Creignou, N., Schmidt, J., Thomas, M., & Woltran, S. (2010). Sets of Boolean Connectives That Make Argumentation Easier. In T. Janhunen & I. Niemelä (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 117–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_12
- An Optimization for Reasoning with Forest Logic Programs / Feier, C., & Heymans, S. (2010). An Optimization for Reasoning with Forest Logic Programs. In S. Woltran & M. Balduccini (Eds.), Proc. of the Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms (ASPOCP 2010) (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53511
- Representing Preferences Among Sets / Brewka, G., Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2010). Representing Preferences Among Sets. In M. Fox & D. Poole (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2010. AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53441
- Redundancy Elimination on RDF Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and Queries / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Redundancy Elimination on RDF Graphs in the Presence of Rules, Constraints, and Queries. In P. Hitzler & T. Lukasiewicz (Eds.), Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (pp. 133–148). Lecture Notes/ Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15918-3_11
- The Complexity of Handling Minimal Solutions in Logic-Based Abduction / Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). The Complexity of Handling Minimal Solutions in Logic-Based Abduction. In H. Coelho, R. Studer, & M. Woolridge (Eds.), Prooceedings of ECAI 2010 - 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 895–900). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53439
- Minimising RDF Graphs under Rules and Constraints Revisited / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Skritek, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Minimising RDF Graphs under Rules and Constraints Revisited. In A. H. F. Laender & L. V. S. Lakshmanan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Alberto Mendelzon International Workshop on Foundations of Data Management. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53438
- A Dynamic-Programming Based ASP-Solver / Morak, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). A Dynamic-Programming Based ASP-Solver. In R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, & W. Wahlster (Eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 369–372). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15675-5_34
- Counting and Enumeration Problems with Bounded Treewidth / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Counting and Enumeration Problems with Bounded Treewidth. In R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, & W. Wahlster (Eds.), Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (pp. 387–404). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17511-4_22
- Decentralized Diagnosis: Complexity Analysis and Datalog Encodings / Pfandler, A., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). Decentralized Diagnosis: Complexity Analysis and Datalog Encodings. In H. Kaiser & R. Kirner (Eds.), Proceedings of the Junior Scientist Conference 2010 (pp. 291–292). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53424
- cf2 Semantics Revisited / Gaggl, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). cf2 Semantics Revisited. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument (pp. 243–254). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53354 / Project: Argu
- Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width / Dvorak, W., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks of Bounded Clique-Width. In P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, & G. R. Simari (Eds.), Proceedings of COMMA 2010 (pp. 219–230). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53323 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
- Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth Is not Enough / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., Szeider, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Tractable Answer-Set Programming with Weight Constraints: Bounded Treewidth Is not Enough. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53171 / Projects: Argu, Complex Reason
- Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Argumentation / Dvorak, W., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2010). Towards Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithms for Argumentation. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53170 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Brewka, G., & Woltran, S. (2010). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 10). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53169 / Project: Argu
- Multicut Algorithms via Tree Decompositions / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2010). Multicut Algorithms via Tree Decompositions. In T. Calamoneri & J. Diaz (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 167–179). LNCS, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13073-1_16 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks / Oikarinen, E., & Woltran, S. (2010). Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks. In F. Lin, U. Sattler, & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Proc. of KR 2010 (p. 11). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53133 / Project: Argu
- On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics / Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2010). On the Intertranslatability of Argumentation Semantics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Thirty Years of Nonmonotonic Reasoning (p. 15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53356 / Project: Argu
2009
- Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae / Besnard, P., Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2009). Encoding deductive argumentation in quantified Boolean formulae. Artificial Intelligence, 173(15), 1406–1423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.06.006 / Project: Argu
- Hyperequivalence of logic programs with respect to supported models / Truszczyński, M., & Woltran, S. (2009). Hyperequivalence of logic programs with respect to supported models. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 53(1–4), 331–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-009-9119-8
- Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity / PEARCE, D., TOMPITS, H., & WOLTRAN, S. (2009). Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(05), 565–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106840999010x
- Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models / Janhunen, T., Oikarinen, E., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 35, 813–857. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2810
- Relativized hyperequivalence of logic programs for modular programming / TRUSZCZYŃSKI, M., & WOLTRAN, S. (2009). Relativized hyperequivalence of logic programs for modular programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(6), 781–819. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068409990159
- A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form / Egly, U., Seidl, M., & Woltran, S. (2009). A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form. Constraints, 14(1), 38–79. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/165275
- Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-reasoning / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-reasoning. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 115–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_12 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-Reasoning / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Manifold Answer-Set Programs for Meta-Reasoning. In A. Herzig & B. Johnston (Eds.), Proc. of the IJCAI-09 Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Action and Change (NRAC’09) (pp. 33–40). ePress of the University of Technology, Sydney. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52762 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks / Woltran, S. (2009). Characterizing Strong Equivalence for Argumentation Frameworks. Argumentation Christmas Meeting, Leipzig, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84908
- Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In P. M. Hill & D. S. Warren (Eds.), Logic Programming: 25th International Conference, ICLP 2009, Pasadena, CA, USA, July 14-17, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 160–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02846-5_17 / Project: TTPC
- ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 382–395). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_32 / Project: Methods
- Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth / Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2009). Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 250–263). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_22 / Project: TTPC
- spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics / Gebser, M., Pührer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 247–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00675-3_17
- Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth / Woltran, S. (2009). Belief Revision with Bounded Treewidth. In G. Bonanno, J. P. Delgrande, & H. Rott (Eds.), Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (p. 51). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52766
- A Framework for Programming with Module Consequences / Faber, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). A Framework for Programming with Module Consequences. In M. De Vos & T. Schaub (Eds.), Proc. of the 2#^{nd} International Workshop on Software Engineering for Answer Set Programming (SEA’09) (pp. 34–48). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52763 / Projects: Argu, TTPC
- Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm. In A. Porto & F. J. Lopez-Fraguas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming - PPDP ’09. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1599410.1599419 / Project: TTPC
- Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 241–246). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52744
- Answer-Set Programming with Bounded Tree Width / Jakl, M., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Answer-Set Programming with Bounded Tree Width. In C. Boutilier (Ed.), Proc. of the Twenty-First Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 816–822). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52743 / Project: TTPC
- Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks / Dvorak, W., & Woltran, S. (2009). Technical Note: Complexity of Stage Semantics in Argumentation Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2009-66). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35719 / Project: Argu
- Alternation as a Programming Paradigm / Dvorak, W., Gottlob, G., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2009). Alternation as a Programming Paradigm (DBAI-TR-2009-64). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35631
2008
- A Common View on Strong, Uniform, and Other Notions of Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming / WOLTRAN, S. (2008). A Common View on Strong, Uniform, and Other Notions of Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 8(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068407003250
- Hyperequivalence of programs and operators (Preliminary version) / Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). Hyperequivalence of programs and operators (Preliminary version). In M. Kaminski & M. Truszczynski (Eds.), Tenth International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Mathematics (ISAIM) (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52639
- Notions of Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction / Faber, W., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Notions of Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunction. In G. Brewka & J. Lang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’08) (pp. 433–443). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52556 / Project: Formale Methoden
- Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Belief Revision of Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In G. Brewka & J. Lang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’08) (pp. 411–421). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52555 / Project: Formale Methoden
- Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks / Egly, U., Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2008). Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks. In W. Faber & J. Lee (Eds.), ICLP-Workshop Proceedings; Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Answer Set Programming and Other Computing Paradigms, ASPOCP 2008 (pp. 1–15). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52469
- Relativized Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs for Modular Programming / Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). Relativized Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs for Modular Programming. In M. G. de la Banda & E. Pontelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24#^{th} Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP’08) (pp. 576–590). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52468
- ASPARTIX: Implementing Argumentation Frameworks Using Answer-Set Programming / Egly, U., Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2008). ASPARTIX: Implementing Argumentation Frameworks Using Answer-Set Programming. In M. G. de la Banda & E. Pontelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24#^{th} Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP’08) (pp. 734–738). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52465
- Fast Counting with Bounded Treewidth / Jakl, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2008). Fast Counting with Bounded Treewidth. In I. Cervesato, H. Veith, & A. Voronkov (Eds.), Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (pp. 436–450). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52425
- Elimination of Disjunction and Negation in Answer-Set Programs under Hyperequivalence / Puehrer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Elimination of Disjunction and Negation in Answer-Set Programs under Hyperequivalence. In M. G. de la Banda & E. Pontelli (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89982-2 / Project: Formale Methoden
- Alternative Characterizations for Program Equivalence under Answer-Set Semantics Based on Unfounded Sets / Gebser, M., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2008). Alternative Characterizations for Program Equivalence under Answer-Set Semantics Based on Unfounded Sets. In S. Hartmann & G. Kern-Isberner (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77684-0 / Project: Formale Methoden
- Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs with Respect to Supported Models / Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs with Respect to Supported Models. In A. Cohn & D. M. Hamilton (Eds.), AAAI-08/IAAI-08 Proceedings (pp. 560–565). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52262
- dRDF: Entailment for Domain-Restricted RDF / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Wei, F., & Woltran, S. (2008). dRDF: Entailment for Domain-Restricted RDF. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 200–214). Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68234-9_17
- A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form / Egly, U., Seidl, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). A Solver for QBFs in Negation Normal Form (INFSYS RR-1843-08-03). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35354
- Fast Counting with Bounded Treewidth / Jakl, M., Pichler, R., Rümmele, S., & Woltran, S. (2008). Fast Counting with Bounded Treewidth (DBAI-TR-2008-61). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35325
- Relativized Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs for Modular Programming / Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). Relativized Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs for Modular Programming (DBAI-TR-2008-63). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35165
- Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks / Egly, U., Gaggl, S. A., & Woltran, S. (2008). Answer-Set Programming Encodings for Argumentation Frameworks (DBAI-TR-2008-62). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35164
- Encoding Deductive Argumentation in Quantified Boolean Formulae / Besnard, P., Hunter, A., & Woltran, S. (2008). Encoding Deductive Argumentation in Quantified Boolean Formulae (DBAI-TR-2008-60). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35163
- dRDF: Entailment for Domain-Restricted RDF / Pichler, R., Polleres, A., Wei, F., & Woltran, S. (2008). dRDF: Entailment for Domain-Restricted RDF (DBAI-TR-2008-59). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35162
- Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs with Respect to Supported Models / Truszczynski, M., & Woltran, S. (2008). Hyperequivalence of Logic Programs with Respect to Supported Models (DBAI-TR-2008-58). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/35161
2007
- Complexity results for answer set programming with bounded predicate arities and implications / Eiter, T., Faber, W., Fink, M., & Woltran, S. (2007). Complexity results for answer set programming with bounded predicate arities and implications. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 51(2–4), 123–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-008-9086-5
- Semantical Characterizations and Complexity of Equivalences in Answer Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Woltran, S. (2007). Semantical Characterizations and Complexity of Equivalences in Answer Set Programming. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 8(3), 1–53. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/169634
- Facts Do Not Cease to Exist Because They Are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection / Oetsch, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Facts Do Not Cease to Exist Because They Are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection. AAAI ’ 07, Vancouver, Canada, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84653
- Characterizing Notions of Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunctions / Faber, W., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Characterizing Notions of Strong Equivalence for Logic Programs with Ordered Disjunctions. In 3rd Multidisciplinary Workshop on Advances in Preference Handling (M-PREF 2007) (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51849
- That is illogical Captain! The Debugging Support Tool spock for Answer-Set Programs -- System Description / Brain, M., Gebser, M., Puehrer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). That is illogical Captain! The Debugging Support Tool spock for Answer-Set Programs -- System Description. In Proceeding of the LPNMR’ 07 Workshop on Software Engineering for Answer Set Programming (pp. 71–85). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51847
- Alternative Characterizations for Program Equivalence under Answer-Set Semantics: Preliminary Report / Gebser, M., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Alternative Characterizations for Program Equivalence under Answer-Set Semantics: Preliminary Report. In Proceedings of the LPNMR’07 Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (pp. 37–48). CEUR-Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51830
- Relativised Equivalence in Equilibrium Logic and its Applications to Prediction and Explanation: Preliminary Report / Pearce, D., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Relativised Equivalence in Equilibrium Logic and its Applications to Prediction and Explanation: Preliminary Report. In Proceedings of the LPNMR’07 Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (pp. 49–60). CEUR-Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51831
- A Common View on Strong, Uniform, and Other Notions of Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming / Woltran, S. (2007). A Common View on Strong, Uniform, and Other Notions of Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of the LPNMR’07 Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (pp. 13–24). CEUR-Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51828
- Facts do not Cease to Exist Because They are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection / Oetsch, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Facts do not Cease to Exist Because They are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection. In D. Pearce, A. F. Polleres, S. Woltran, & A. Valverde (Eds.), Proceedings of the LPNMR’07 Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (pp. 25–36). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51829
- Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models / Janhunen, T., Oikarinen, E., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models. In Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR ’07) (pp. 175–187). LNCS/Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51827
- Debugging ASP Programs by Means of ASP / Brain, M., Gebser, M., Puehrer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Debugging ASP Programs by Means of ASP. In Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR ’07) (pp. 31–43). LNCS/Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51826
- Facts Do Not Cease to Exist Because They Are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection / Oetsch, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Facts Do Not Cease to Exist Because They Are Ignored: Relativised Uniform Equivalence with Answer-Set Projection. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (p. 7). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51825
- Complexity of Rule Redundancy in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming over Finite Domains / Fink, M., Pichler, R., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Complexity of Rule Redundancy in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming over Finite Domains. In C. Baral, G. Brewka, & J. Schlipf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2007) (pp. 123–135). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51780
- Complexity Results for Checking Equivalence of Stratified Logic Programs / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Complexity Results for Checking Equivalence of Stratified Logic Programs. In M. Veloso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007) (pp. 330–335). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51779
- spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics / Gebser, M., Puehrer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics. In Proc. of 17th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2007) and 21st Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming (WLP 2007) (p. 4). Bayerische Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg,. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52027
- Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT. In Proc. of 17th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP 2007) and 21st Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming (WLP 2007) (p. 4). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51977
- Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity / Pearce, D., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2007). Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity (GIA-TR-2007-12-01). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/33090
- Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (CENT 2007) / Workshop on Correspondence and Equivalence for Nonmonotonic Theories (CENT 2007). (2007). In D. Pearce, A. F. Polleres, A. Valverde, & S. Woltran (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/22346
2006
- Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84538
- Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84537
- Complexity Results for Checking Equivalence of Stratified Logic Programs / Woltran, S. (2006). Complexity Results for Checking Equivalence of Stratified Logic Programs. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84536
- ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings. ICLP’06 Workshop: Lash’06, Seattle, Washington, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51606 / Project: ModelCVS
- An Implementation for Recognizing Rule Replacements in Non-ground Answer-Set Programs / Eiter, T., Traxler, P., & Woltran, S. (2006). An Implementation for Recognizing Rule Replacements in Non-ground Answer-Set Programs. In M. Fisher, W. van der Hoek, B. Konev, & A. Lisitsa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2006) (pp. 477–480). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51589
- dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings 20th Workshop on Logic Programming and Constraint Systems (WLP ’06) (pp. 206–210). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51580
- A Solver for QBFs in Nonprenex Form: Overview and Experimental Results / Egly, U., Seidl, M., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Solver for QBFs in Nonprenex Form: Overview and Experimental Results. In Proceedings of the Guangzhou Symposioum on Satisfiability in Logic-Based Modeling (p. 11). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51624 / Project: ModelCVS
- ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of CIC-06 (pp. 3–11). IEEE Computer Society. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51609 / Project: ModelCVS
- Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas / Egly, U., & Woltran, S. (2006). Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas. In P. E. Dunne & T. J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2006) (pp. 133–144). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51590
- Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Traxler, P., & Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. In P. Doherty, J. Mylopoulos, & C. Welty (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), Lake District of the United Kingdom, June 2--5 (pp. 340–351). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51567
- Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Traxler, P., & Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24 (p. 9). TU Wien, Institut fuer Informationssysteme. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51566
- Algorithmic Aspectc of Model Representations / Pichler, R. (2006). Algorithmic Aspectc of Model Representations. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP2006) (pp. 12–20). INFSYS Research Report. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51472
- A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings is for the Eleventh International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning. 11th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Lake District, UK, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51451 / Project: ModelCVS
- A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming: Preliminary Experimental Results / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming: Preliminary Experimental Results. In Online Proceedings - WLP 2006. 20th Workshop on Logic Programming, Wien, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51450 / Project: ModelCVS
- ccT: A Correspondence-Checking Tool For Logic Programs Under The Answer-Set Semantics / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Correspondence-Checking Tool For Logic Programs Under The Answer-Set Semantics. In Proceedings of the JELIA2006 (pp. 502–505). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51449 / Project: ModelCVS
- A Solver for QBFs in Nonprenex Form / Egly, U., Seidl, M., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Solver for QBFs in Nonprenex Form. In Proceedings of the ECAI 2006 (pp. 477–481). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51448 / Project: ModelCVS
- Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24 / Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24. TU Wien. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/22322
2005
- On Deciding Subsumption Problems / Egly, U., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2005). On Deciding Subsumption Problems. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 43(1–4), 255–294. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/173345
- On Solution Correspondences in Answer Set Programming: A General Framework (and Characterizations for the Ground Case) / Woltran, S. (2005). On Solution Correspondences in Answer Set Programming: A General Framework (and Characterizations for the Ground Case). Dagstuhl Seminar Nr. 05171, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints, Dagstuhl, Deutschland, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84445
- Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming: An Overview / Woltran, S. (2005). Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming: An Overview. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84444
- Node Presentation: TU Wien / Woltran, S. (2005). Node Presentation: TU Wien. International Workshop on Answer Set Programming (ASP), Bath, UK, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84443
- Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming: An Overview / Woltran, S. (2005). Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming: An Overview. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84442
- Survey of Equivalences in ASP / Woltran, S. (2005). Survey of Equivalences in ASP. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84441
- Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In M. De Vos & A. Provetti (Eds.), Answer Set Programming, Advances in Theory and Implementation, Proceedings of the 3rd Intl. ASP’05 Workshop (pp. 115–129). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51106
- Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In M. Gabbrielli & G. Gupta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Logic Programming (pp. 189–203). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51103
- On Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). On Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05) (pp. 97–102). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51105
- Strong and Uniform Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming: Characterizations and Complexity Results for the Non-Ground Case / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Strong and Uniform Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming: Characterizations and Complexity Results for the Non-Ground Case. In Proceedings, The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Seventeenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, (pp. 695–700). AAAI Press / The MIT Press 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51104
- Semantical Characterizations and Complexity of Equivalences in Answer Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Woltran, S. (2005). Semantical Characterizations and Complexity of Equivalences in Answer Set Programming. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/33032
- Representing Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Propositional Logic / Besnard, P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Representing Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Propositional Logic. In L. Bertossi (Ed.), Inconsistency Tolerance (pp. 84–118). Springer, LNCS 3300. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/25356
2004
- On Simplifying and Rewriting Logic Programs: Characterisations and Complexity / Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2004). On Simplifying and Rewriting Logic Programs: Characterisations and Complexity. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84318
- Elimination of Disjunction in Stable Logic Programming / Woltran, S. (2004). Elimination of Disjunction in Stable Logic Programming. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84317
- Relativized Notions of Equivalence in ASP / Woltran, S. (2004). Relativized Notions of Equivalence in ASP. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84316
- Complexity of Equivalence between Propositional Logic Programs / Woltran, S. (2004). Complexity of Equivalence between Propositional Logic Programs. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84315
2003
- Paraconsistent Reasoning via QBFs / Woltran, S. (2003). Paraconsistent Reasoning via QBFs. Dagstuhl Seminar Nr. 03241, Inconsistency Tolerance, Dagstuhl, Germany, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84237
- Methods for data acquisition and transformation / Eiter, T., Faber, W., Fink, M., Woltran, S., & Zalewska, L. (2003). Methods for data acquisition and transformation. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32954
- Complexity of Answer Set Checking and Bounded Predicate Arities for Non-Ground Answer Set Programming / Eiter, T., Faber, W., Pfeifer, G., Fink, M., & Woltran, S. (2003). Complexity of Answer Set Checking and Bounded Predicate Arities for Non-Ground Answer Set Programming. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32930
- On Deciding Subsumption Problems / Egly, U., Pichler, R., & Woltran, S. (2003). On Deciding Subsumption Problems. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32928
- On Eliminating Disjunctions in Stable Logic Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2003). On Eliminating Disjunctions in Stable Logic Programming. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32929
- On Computing Solutions to Belief Change Scenarios / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2003). On Computing Solutions to Belief Change Scenarios. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32927
2002
- Deciding Strong Equivalence between Logic Programs / Woltran, S. (2002). Deciding Strong Equivalence between Logic Programs. Seminarvortrag, Regensburg, Germany, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84095
- On Implementing Nested Logic Programs / Woltran, S. (2002). On Implementing Nested Logic Programs. Dagstuhl Seminar Nr. 02381, Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Answer Set Programming and Constraints, Schloss Dagstuhl, Deutschland, Austria. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/84093
- Polynomial Translations of Nested Logic Programs into Disjunctive Logic Programs / Pearce, D., Schaub, T., Sarsakov, V., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2002). Polynomial Translations of Nested Logic Programs into Disjunctive Logic Programs. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/32790
Supervisions
Note: Due to the rollout of TU Wien’s new publication database, the list below may be slightly outdated. Once the migration is complete, everything will be up to date again.
2023
- Unpacking The Argument - A Claim-Centric View On Abstract Argumentation / Rapberger, A. (2023). Unpacking The Argument - A Claim-Centric View On Abstract Argumentation [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2023.112445
- A Novel Method for Grounding in Answer-Set Programming / Besin, V. (2023). A Novel Method for Grounding in Answer-Set Programming [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2023.103458
2022
- Algorithmic Advances via Graph Decomposition / Hamm, T. (2022). Algorithmic Advances via Graph Decomposition [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2022.108300
- Towards parallel algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks / Hofer, M. (2022). Towards parallel algorithms for abstract dialectical frameworks [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2022.90783
2021
- Advanced Tools and Methods for Treewidth-Based Problem Solving / Hecher, M. (2021). Advanced Tools and Methods for Treewidth-Based Problem Solving [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2021.97063
2020
- Ranking sets of objects : how to deal with impossibility results / Maly, J. (2020). Ranking sets of objects : how to deal with impossibility results [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.83187
- Graph-classes of argumentation frameworks with collective attacks : properties and complexity results / König, M. (2020). Graph-classes of argumentation frameworks with collective attacks : properties and complexity results [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.77665
- Disjunctive answer set programming with backjumping and learning / Kammerhofer, I. (2020). Disjunctive answer set programming with backjumping and learning [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.56101
- Choosing what to believe : belief change through the lens of rational choice / Haret, A. (2020). Choosing what to believe : belief change through the lens of rational choice [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.42785
- A General framework for choice logics / Bernreiter, M. (2020). A General framework for choice logics [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2020.79388
2019
- Realising argumentation using answer set programming and quantified boolean formulas / Diller, M. (2019). Realising argumentation using answer set programming and quantified boolean formulas [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2019.66428
- Argumentation frameworks with claims and collective attacks - : complexity results and answer-set programming encodings / Greßler, A. (2019). Argumentation frameworks with claims and collective attacks - : complexity results and answer-set programming encodings [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2019.66220
- Algorithms for implicit delegation to predict preferences / Krenn, B. (2019). Algorithms for implicit delegation to predict preferences [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2019.69824
2018
- A solver for the Steiner tree problem with few terminals / Schidler, A. (2018). A solver for the Steiner tree problem with few terminals [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2018.55931
- Advancements in equivalence checking for abstract argumentation frameworks / Bellositz, P. (2018). Advancements in equivalence checking for abstract argumentation frameworks [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2018.52528
- Solving the #SAT problem on the GPU with dynamic programming and OpenCL / Zisser, M. (2018). Solving the #SAT problem on the GPU with dynamic programming and OpenCL [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2018.52062
- Expressive rule-based stream reasoning / Beck, H. (2018). Expressive rule-based stream reasoning [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2018.61225
2017
- BDD-based dynamic programming on tree decompositions : towards an alternative approach for efficient QBF solving / Charwat, G. (2017). BDD-based dynamic programming on tree decompositions : towards an alternative approach for efficient QBF solving [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/78589
- Tailored tree decompositions for efficient problem solving / Abseher, M. (2017). Tailored tree decompositions for efficient problem solving [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2017.25691
2016
- Ein System für graphische Argumentationsformalismen / Heißenberger, G. (2016). Ein System für graphische Argumentationsformalismen [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2016.33758
- Designing a system for experimental analysis and visualization of dynamic programming on tree decompositions / Ambroz, T., & Jusits, A. (2016). Designing a system for experimental analysis and visualization of dynamic programming on tree decompositions [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2016.33950
2015
- Optimizing second-level dynamic programming algorithms : the D-FLAT 2 system: encodings and experimental evaluation / Hecher, M. (2015). Optimizing second-level dynamic programming algorithms : the D-FLAT 2 system: encodings and experimental evaluation [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2015.30029
- Structure in #SAT and QBF / Slivovsky, F. (2015). Structure in #SAT and QBF [Dissertation, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://doi.org/10.34726/hss.2015.29740
2013
- On the limits of expressiveness in abstract argumentation semantics : realizability and signatures / Linsbichler, T. (2013). On the limits of expressiveness in abstract argumentation semantics : realizability and signatures [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-59920
2012
- Decompose, guess and check : declarative problem solving on tree decompositions / Bliem, B. (2012). Decompose, guess and check : declarative problem solving on tree decompositions [Diploma Thesis, Zsfassung in dt. Sprache]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-55978
- Abstract Dialectical Frameworks : properties, complexity, and implementation / Ellmauthaler, S. (2012). Abstract Dialectical Frameworks : properties, complexity, and implementation [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-46394
2011
- dynASP : a dynamic programming-based answer set programming solver / Morak, M. (2011). dynASP : a dynamic programming-based answer set programming solver [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-42316
2009
- Alternation as a programming paradigm / Dvořák, W. (2009). Alternation as a programming paradigm [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-27673
2008
- Efficient counting with bounded treewidth using datalog / Rümmele, S. (2008). Efficient counting with bounded treewidth using datalog [Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Wien]. reposiTUm. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:1-22267
Awards
-
EurAI Fellows programme
2018 / EurAI Fellow / Website -
Treating Hard Problems with Decomposition and Dynamic Programming (Decodyn)
2014 / START-Programm / Austria / Website / Project -
Distinguished student paper prize at the 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.
2012 / KR Inc -
OCG-Förderpreis
2002 / Austria
And more…
Soon, this page will include additional information such as reference projects, activities as journal reviewer and editor, memberships in councils and committees, and other research activities.
Until then, please visit Stefan Woltran’s research profile in TISS .