TU Wien Informatics

20 Years
Overview Professors Scientific Staff Administrative Staff Student Staff External Lecturers By Responsibilities By Committee By Name
Related
Guest Professors Honoraries Alumni (LinkedIn) #5qw

Hans Tompits

Ao.Univ.Prof. Mag.rer.nat. Dr.techn.

Research Focus

  • Logic and Computation: 100%

Research Areas

  • computational logic, declarative logic programming, computational complexity, nonmonotonic reasoning, knowledge representation

About

Basic Research in logic-based Artificial Intelligence, computational Logic and logical Programming (Answer-Set Programming)

Roles

Contact

2024W

2025S

 

2022

2021

2020

  • Catching the Ouroboros: On debugging non-ground answer-set programs / Oetsch, J., Pührer, J., & Tompits, H. (2020). Catching the Ouroboros: On debugging non-ground answer-set programs. 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2020), Rende, Italy. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/87161
  • Sequent-Type Calculi for Systems of Nonmonotonic Paraconsistent Logics / Geibinger, T., & Tompits, H. (2020). Sequent-Type Calculi for Systems of Nonmonotonic Paraconsistent Logics. In Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (pp. 178–191). Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science (EPTCS). https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.325.23
  • Towards a Reliable and Context-Based System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles / Kain, T., Mundhenk, P., Müller, J.-S., Tompits, H., Wesche, M., & Decke, H. (2020). Towards a Reliable and Context-Based System Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Autonomous Systems Design (pp. 1–7). Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ASD.2020.1
  • Optimizing the Placement of Applications in Autonomous Vehicles / Kain, T., Tompits, H., Müller, J.-S., Wesche, M., Martinez Flores, Y. A., & Decke, H. (2020). Optimizing the Placement of Applications in Autonomous Vehicles. In E-proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55587
  • Fdiro: A General Approach for a Fail-Operational System Design / Kain, T., Tompits, H., Müller, J.-S., Mundhenk, P., Wesche, M., & Decke, H. (2020). Fdiro: A General Approach for a Fail-Operational System Design. In E-proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (ESREL2020 PSAM15) (p. 8). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55586
  • Sequent-Type Calculi for Three-Valued and Disjunctive Default Logic / Pkhakadze, S., & Tompits, H. (2020). Sequent-Type Calculi for Three-Valued and Disjunctive Default Logic. Axioms, 9(3), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms9030084

2019

2018

  • Local Redundancy in SAT: Generalizations of Blocked Clauses / Kiesl, B., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Biere, A. (2018). Local Redundancy in SAT: Generalizations of Blocked Clauses. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.23638/LMCS-14(4:3)2018
  • Stepwise debugging of answer-set programs / Oetsch, J., Pührer, J., & Tompits, H. (2018). Stepwise debugging of answer-set programs. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 18(1), 30–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068417000217
  • A many-sorted variant of Japaridze's polymodal provability logic / Berger, G., Beklemishev, L. D., & Tompits, H. (2018). A many-sorted variant of Japaridze’s polymodal provability logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 26(5), 505–538. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzy012
  • From Łukasiewicz to Gentzen: On Sequent-type Refutation Calculi for Three-valued Logics / Tompits, H. (2018). From Łukasiewicz to Gentzen: On Sequent-type Refutation Calculi for Three-valued Logics. Refutation Symposium 2018 at Poznań Reasoning Week, Poznań, Poland, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/86853
  • An Approach for Representing Answer Sets in Natural Language / Fang, M., & Tompits, H. (2018). An Approach for Representing Answer Sets in Natural Language. In Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management - Conference on Declarative Programming, DECLARE 2017, Unifying INAP, WFLP, and WLP, Würzburg, Germany, September 19-22, 2017, Revised Selected Papers. (pp. 115–131). Springer LNCS. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57752
  • A Tableau Calculus for a Multi-modal Logic of Dishonesty / Pavlovic, S., & Tompits, H. (2018). A Tableau Calculus for a Multi-modal Logic of Dishonesty. In AI*IA 2018 - Advances in Artificial Intelligence - XVIIth International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Trento, Italy, November 20-23, 2018, Proceedings (pp. 238–251). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57749

2017

  • Blocked Clauses in First-Order Logic / Kiesl, B., Suda, M., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Biere, A. (2017). Blocked Clauses in First-Order Logic. In T. Eiter & D. Sands (Eds.), LPAR-21. 21st International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence and Reasoning. EasyChair. https://resolver.obvsg.at/urn:nbn:at:at-ubtuw:3-3121
    Download: PDF (412 KB)
  • Blockedness in Propositional Logic: Are You Satisfied With Your Neighborhood? / Kiesl, B., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Biere, A. (2017). Blockedness in Propositional Logic: Are You Satisfied With Your Neighborhood? In F. Bacchus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/687
  • $$\mathsf {Harvey}$$ : A System for Random Testing in ASP / Greßler, A., Oetsch, J., & Tompits, H. (2017). $$\mathsf {Harvey}$$ : A System for Random Testing in ASP. In M. Balduccini & T. Janhunen (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 229–235). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61660-5_21
  • An Approach for Representing Answer Sets in Natural Language / Tompits, H., & Fang, M. (2017). An Approach for Representing Answer Sets in Natural Language. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & S. Abreu (Eds.), Declare 2017 - Conference on Declarative Programming (pp. 107–122). Technical Report, Institute of Computer Science, University of Würzburg. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/57281

2016

  • Super-Blocked Clauses / Kiesl, B., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Biere, A. (2016). Super-Blocked Clauses. In N. Olivetti & A. Tiwari (Eds.), Automated Reasoning : 8th International Joint Conference, IJCAR 2016, Coimbra, Portugal, June 27 – July 2, 2016, Proceedings. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40229-1_5
    Download: PDF (321 KB)

2015

  • On Structural Analysis of Non-Ground Answer-Set Programs / Kiesl, B., Schüller, P., & Tompits, H. (2015). On Structural Analysis of Non-Ground Answer-Set Programs. In M. De Vos, T. Eiter, Y. Lierler, & F. Toni (Eds.), Proceedings of the Technical Communications of the 31st International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2015) (p. 14). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/56289

2014

  • On Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic $$\mathcal {ALC}$$ / Berger, G., & Tompits, H. (2014). On Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic $$\mathcal {ALC}$$. In M. Hanus & R. Rocha (Eds.), Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 65–82). Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08909-6_5
  • Compact Argumentation Frameworks / Baumann, R., Dvorak, W., Linsbichler, T., Strass, H., & Woltran, S. (2014). Compact Argumentation Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55236
  • Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks / Polberg, S. (2014). Extension-based Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), 15th International Workshop on Non-monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014) (p. 10). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55235

2013

  • SeaLion: An Eclipse-based IDE for Answer-Set Programming with Advanced Debugging Support / Busoniu, P.-A., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., Skocovsky, P., & Tompits, H. (2013). SeaLion: An Eclipse-based IDE for Answer-Set Programming with Advanced Debugging Support. In Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Volume 13, Special Issue 4-5 (29th International Conference on Logic Programming) (pp. 657–673). Cambridge University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55044
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems / Dvořák, W., Gaggl, S. A., Wallner, J. P., & Woltran, S. (2013). Making Use of Advances in Answer-Set Programming for Abstract Argumentation Systems. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 114–133). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_7
  • HEX-Programs with Nested Program Calls / Eiter, T., Krennwallner, T., & Redl, C. (2013). HEX-Programs with Nested Program Calls. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Puehrer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 269–278). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_15
    Projects: ASP (2012–2015) / HEX-Programme (2008–2012)
  • A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming / Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). A Model-Theoretic Approach to Belief Change in Answer Set Programming. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 14(2), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/2480759.2480766
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • On Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic ALC / Berger, G., & Tompits, H. (2013). On Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic ALC. In M. Hanus & R. Rocha (Eds.), Kiel Declarative Programming Days 2013 (pp. 78–92). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/55038
  • Kara: A System for Visualising and Visual Editing of Interpretations for Answer-Set Programs / Kloimüllner, C., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2013). Kara: A System for Visualising and Visual Editing of Interpretations for Answer-Set Programs. In Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management, 19th International Conference, INAP 2011 and 25th Workshop on Logic Programming, WLP 2011 Vienna, Austria, September 28-30, 2011 Revised Selected Papers (pp. 325–344). Springer, LNAI. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54279
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Guided Merging of Sequence Diagrams / Widl, M., Biere, A., Kaufmann, P., Egly, U., Heule, M., Kappel, G., Seidl, M., & Tompits, H. (2013). Guided Merging of Sequence Diagrams. In Software Language Engineering (pp. 164–183). Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 7745. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36089-3_10
    Projects: Boolean (2011–2019) / FAME (2011–2014)
  • Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Pührer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, 23(1–2), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2013.799318
  • The Parameterized Complexity of Constraint Satisfaction and Reasoning / Szeider, S. (2013). The Parameterized Complexity of Constraint Satisfaction and Reasoning. In H. Tompits, S. Abreu, J. Oetsch, J. Pührer, D. Seipel, M. Umeda, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 27–37). Springer / LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41524-1_2
    Project: Complex Reason (2010–2014)
  • The SeaLion has Landed: An IDE for Answer-Set Programming-Preliminary Report / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2013). The SeaLion has Landed: An IDE for Answer-Set Programming-Preliminary Report. In Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management, 19th International Conference, INAP 2011, and 25th Workshop on Logic Programming, WLP 2011, Vienna, Austria, September 28-30, 2011, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 305–324). Springer, LNAI. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54280
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Puehrer, J., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2013). Model-Based Recasting in Answer-Set Programming (DBAI-TR-2013-83). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/37698
  • Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management, 19th International Conference, INAP 2011 and 25th Workshop on Logic Programming, WLP 2011 Vienna, Austria, September 28-30, 2011, Revised Selected Papers / Tompits, H., Abreu, S., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., Seipel, D., Umeda, M., & Wolf, A. (Eds.). (2013). Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management, 19th International Conference, INAP 2011 and 25th Workshop on Logic Programming, WLP 2011 Vienna, Austria, September 28-30, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. Springer, LNAI. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/23778
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)

2012

  • On the Small-Scope Hypothesis for Testing Answer-Set Programs / Oetsch, J., Prischink, M., Puehrer, J., Schwengerer, M., & Tompits, H. (2012). On the Small-Scope Hypothesis for Testing Answer-Set Programs. In 13th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 43–53). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54275
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Event-Sequence Testing using Answer-Set Programming / Brain, M., Erdem, E., Inoue, K., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., Tompits, H., & Yilmaz, C. (2012). Event-Sequence Testing using Answer-Set Programming. International Journal On Advances in Software, 5(3 & amp; 4), 15. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/164382
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Stepwise Debugging of Description-Logic Programs / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2012). Stepwise Debugging of Description-Logic Programs. In Correct Reasoning - Essays on Logic-Based AI in Honour of Vladimir Lifschitz (pp. 492–508). Springer, LNCS 7265. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/27700
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Extending Object-Oriented Languages by Declarative Specifications of Complex Objects using Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2012). Extending Object-Oriented Languages by Declarative Specifications of Complex Objects using Answer-Set Programming. In 26th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2012) (pp. 129–137). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54278
  • LANA: A Language for Annotating Answer-Set Programs / De Vos, M., Kisa, D. G., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2012). LANA: A Language for Annotating Answer-Set Programs. In 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (p. 9). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54274
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Guided Merging of Sequence Diagrams / Widl, M., Biere, A., Kaufmann, P., Egly, U., Heule, M., Kappel, G., Seidl, M., & Tompits, H. (2012). Guided Merging of Sequence Diagrams. In K. Czarnecki & G. Hedin (Eds.), SLE 2012 - Pre-proceedings (pp. 163–182). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54255
    Projects: Boolean (2011–2019) / FAME (2011–2014)
  • An FLP-Style Answer-Set Semantics for Abstract-Constraint Programs with Disjunctions / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2012). An FLP-Style Answer-Set Semantics for Abstract-Constraint Programs with Disjunctions. In Technical Communications of the 28th International Conference on Logic Programming (p. 12). LIPIcs, Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/54277
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Annotating Answer-Set Programs in LANA / DE VOS, M., KISA, D. G., OETSCH, J., PÜHRER, J., & TOMPITS, H. (2012). Annotating Answer-Set Programs in LANA. In Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (pp. 619–637). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106841200021x
  • Towards Semantics-Aware Merge Support in Optimistic Model Versioning / Kaufmann, P., Egly, U., Gabmeyer, S., Kappel, G., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., Widl, M., & Wimmer, M. (2012). Towards Semantics-Aware Merge Support in Optimistic Model Versioning. In Models in Software Engineering (pp. 246–256). Springer LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29645-1_24
    Projects: Boolean (2011–2019) / FAME (2011–2014)
  • Towards Scenario-Based Testing of UML Diagrams / Kaufmann, P., Egly, U., Gabmeyer, S., Kappel, G., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., Widl, M., & Wimmer, M. (2012). Towards Scenario-Based Testing of UML Diagrams. In Tests and Proofs (pp. 149–155). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30473-6_12
    Projects: Boolean (2011–2019) / FAME (2011–2014)

2011

2010

  • Catching the Ouroboros: On debugging non-ground answer-set programs / OETSCH, J., PÜHRER, J., & TOMPITS, H. (2010). Catching the Ouroboros: On debugging non-ground answer-set programs. In M. Hermenegildo & T. Schaub (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (pp. 513–529). Theory and Practice of Logic Programming / Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068410000256
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • The system Kato: Detecting cases of plagiarism for answer-set programs / OETSCH, J., PÜHRER, J., SCHWENGERER, M., & TOMPITS, H. (2010). The system Kato: Detecting cases of plagiarism for answer-set programs. In M. Hermenegildo & T. Schaub (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (pp. 759–775). Theory and Practice of Logic Programming / Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068410000402
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Methods and Methodologies for Developing Answer-Set Programs - Project Description / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2010). Methods and Methodologies for Developing Answer-Set Programs - Project Description. In M. Hermenegildo & T. Schaub (Eds.), Technical Communications of the 26th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2010) (pp. 154–161). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics / Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53228
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • On Testing Answer-Set Programs / Niemelä, I., Janhunen, T., Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2010). On Testing Answer-Set Programs. In H. Coelho, R. Studer, & M. Wooldridge (Eds.), 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2010) (pp. 951–956). IOS Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53226
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Gentzen-type Refutation Systems for Three-Valued Logics / Oetsch, J., & Tompits, H. (2010). Gentzen-type Refutation Systems for Three-Valued Logics. In S. Abdennadher (Ed.), 24th Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming WLP’2010 (pp. 88–98). Technical Report, Faculty of Media Engineering and Technology, German University in Cairo. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53225
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Let's Break the Rules: Interactive Procedural-Style Debugging of Answer-Set Programs / Oetsch, J., Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2010). Let’s Break the Rules: Interactive Procedural-Style Debugging of Answer-Set Programs. In S. Abdennadher (Ed.), 24th Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming WLP’2010 (pp. 77–87). Technical Report, Faculty of Media Engineering and Technology, German University in Cairo. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/53224
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)

2009

  • spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics / Gebser, M., Pührer, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). spock: A Debugging Support Tool for Logic Programs under the Answer-Set Semantics. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 247–252). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00675-3_17
  • Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models / Janhunen, T., Oikarinen, E., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Modularity Aspects of Disjunctive Stable Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 35, 813–857. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2810
  • Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity / PEARCE, D., TOMPITS, H., & WOLTRAN, S. (2009). Characterising Equilibrium Logic and Nested Logic Programs: Reductions and Complexity. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 9(05), 565–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147106840999010x
  • ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). ccT on Stage: Generalised Uniform Equivalence Testing for Verifying Student Assignment Solutions. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 382–395). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_32
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Casting Away Disjunction and Negation under a Generalisation of Strong Equivalence with Projection / Puehrer, J., & Tompits, H. (2009). Casting Away Disjunction and Negation under a Generalisation of Strong Equivalence with Projection. In E. Erdem, F. Lin, & T. Schaub (Eds.), Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning: 10th International Conference, LPNMR 2009, Potsdam, Germany, September 14-18, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 264–276). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04238-6_23
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Kato: A Plagiarism-Detection Tool for Answer-Set Programs / Oetsch, J., Schwengerer, M., & Tompits, H. (2009). Kato: A Plagiarism-Detection Tool for Answer-Set Programs. In A. Wolf & U. Geske (Eds.), 23rd Workshop on (Constraint) Logic Programming (pp. 75–79). Universitätsverlag Potsdam. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52746
    Project: Methods (2009–2013)
  • Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Merging Logic Programs under Answer Set Semantics. In P. M. Hill & D. S. Warren (Eds.), Logic Programming: 25th International Conference, ICLP 2009, Pasadena, CA, USA, July 14-17, 2009, Proceedings (pp. 160–174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02846-5_17
    Project: TTPC (2008–2012)
  • Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2009). Testing Relativised Uniform Equivalence under Answer-Set Projection in the System ccT. In D. Seipel, M. Hanus, & A. Wolf (Eds.), Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (pp. 241–246). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/52744

2008

2007

2006

  • Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Polleres, A., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies. In P. Barahona, F. Bry, E. Franconi, N. Henze, & U. Sattler (Eds.), Reasoning Web Second International Summer School 2006, Lisbon, Portugal, September 4-8, 2006, Tutorial Lectures (pp. 93–127). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11837787_4
  • Algorithmic Aspectc of Model Representations / Pichler, R. (2006). Algorithmic Aspectc of Model Representations. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP2006) (pp. 12–20). INFSYS Research Report. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51472
  • ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings. ICLP’06 Workshop: Lash’06, Seattle, Washington, Non-EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51606
    Project: ModelCVS (2006–2007)
  • dlvhex: A Tool for Semantic-Web Reasoning under the Answer-Set Semantics / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). dlvhex: A Tool for Semantic-Web Reasoning under the Answer-Set Semantics. In A. F. Polleres, S. Decker, G. Gupta, & J. De Bruijn (Eds.), Informal Proceedings Workshop on Applications of Logic Programming in the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (ALPSWS 2006) (pp. 33–39). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51581
  • dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). dlvhex: A System for Integrating Multiple Semantics in an Answer-Set Programming Framework. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings 20th Workshop on Logic Programming and Constraint Systems (WLP ’06) (pp. 206–210). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51580
  • Effective Integration of Declarative Rules with External Evaluations for Semantic Web Reasoning / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). Effective Integration of Declarative Rules with External Evaluations for Semantic Web Reasoning. In Y. Sure & J. Domingue (Eds.), The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. Proceedings 3rd European Conference on Semantic Web (ESWC 2006) (pp. 273–287). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51579
  • On Representational Issues about Combinations of Classical Theories with Nonmonotonic Rules / De Bruijn, J., Eiter, T., Polleres, A. F., & Tompits, H. (2006). On Representational Issues about Combinations of Classical Theories with Nonmonotonic Rules. In J. Lang, F. Lin, & J. Wang (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2006) (pp. 1–22). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51660
  • A RuleML Syntax for Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). A RuleML Syntax for Answer-Set Programming. In A. F. Polleres, S. Decker, G. Gupta, & J. De Bruijn (Eds.), Informal Proceedings Workshop on Applications of Logic Programming in the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (ALPSWS 2006), at FLOC/ICLP 2006. (pp. 107–108). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51748
  • dlvhex: A Prover for Semantic-Web Reasoning under Answer-Set Semantics / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). dlvhex: A Prover for Semantic-Web Reasoning under Answer-Set Semantics. In T. Nishida, Z. Shi, U. Visser, X. Wu, J. Liu, B. Wah, W. Cheung, & Y.-M. Cheung (Eds.), Proceedings The 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-06) (pp. 1073–1074). IEEE Computer Society Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51711
  • Towards Efficient Evaluation of HEX Programs / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2006). Towards Efficient Evaluation of HEX Programs. In J. Dix & A. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning (pp. 40–46). Clausthal University of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51648
  • Forgetting in Managing Rules and Ontologies / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H., & Wang, K. (2006). Forgetting in Managing Rules and Ontologies. In T. Nishida, Z. Shi, U. Visser, X. Wu, J. Liu, B. Wah, W. Cheung, & Y.-M. Cheung (Eds.), Proceedings The 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-06) (pp. 411–419). IEEE Computer Society Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51645
  • Forgetting in Managing Rules and Ontologies / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H., & Wang, K. (2006). Forgetting in Managing Rules and Ontologies. In A. F. Polleres, S. Decker, G. Gupta, & J. De Bruijn (Eds.), Informal Proceedings Workshop on Applications of Logic Programming in the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (ALPSWS 2006) (pp. 1–16). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51641
  • ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Tool for Checking Advanced Correspondence Problems in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of CIC-06 (pp. 3–11). IEEE Computer Society. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51609
    Project: ModelCVS (2006–2007)
  • A Preference-Based Framework for Updating Logic Programs: Preliminary Report / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., & Tompits, H. (2006). A Preference-Based Framework for Updating Logic Programs: Preliminary Report. In E. Pontelli & T. C. Son (Eds.), Informal Proceedings Workshop on Preferences and their Applications in Logic Programming (PREFS 2006) (p. 15). FLOC-Workshop on Preferences and their Applications in Logic Programming (PREFS 2006). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51592
  • Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Traxler, P., & Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. In P. Doherty, J. Mylopoulos, & C. Welty (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), Lake District of the United Kingdom, June 2--5 (pp. 340–351). AAAI Press. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51567
  • Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Traxler, P., & Woltran, S. (2006). Replacements in Non-Ground Answer-Set Programming. In M. Fink, H. Tompits, & S. Woltran (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24 (p. 9). TU Wien, Institut fuer Informationssysteme. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51566
  • A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings is for the Eleventh International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning. 11th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Lake District, UK, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51451
    Project: ModelCVS (2006–2007)
  • A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming: Preliminary Experimental Results / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). A Tool for Advanced Correspondence Checking in Answer-Set Programming: Preliminary Experimental Results. In Online Proceedings - WLP 2006. 20th Workshop on Logic Programming, Wien, EU. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51450
    Project: ModelCVS (2006–2007)
  • ccT: A Correspondence-Checking Tool For Logic Programs Under The Answer-Set Semantics / Oetsch, J., Seidl, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2006). ccT: A Correspondence-Checking Tool For Logic Programs Under The Answer-Set Semantics. In Proceedings of the JELIA2006 (pp. 502–505). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51449
    Project: ModelCVS (2006–2007)
  • Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24 / Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Logic Programming (WLP 2006), Vienna, Austria, February 22--24. TU Wien. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/22322

2005

  • Reasoning about Evolving Nonmonotonic Knowledge Bases / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Sabbatini, G., & Tompits, H. (2005). Reasoning about Evolving Nonmonotonic Knowledge Bases. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 6(2), 389–440. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/173370
  • Representing Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Propositional Logic / Besnard, P., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Representing Paraconsistent Reasoning via Quantified Propositional Logic. In L. Bertossi (Ed.), Inconsistency Tolerance (pp. 84–118). Springer, LNCS 3300. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/25356
  • Nonmonotonic Description Logic Programs: Implementation and Experiments / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2005). Nonmonotonic Description Logic Programs: Implementation and Experiments. In F. Baader & A. Voronkov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning (pp. 511–527). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51275
  • Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In M. De Vos & A. Provetti (Eds.), Answer Set Programming, Advances in Theory and Implementation, Proceedings of the 3rd Intl. ASP’05 Workshop (pp. 115–129). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51106
  • Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming / Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Towards Implementations for Advanced Equivalence Checking in Answer-Set Programming. In M. Gabbrielli & G. Gupta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Logic Programming (pp. 189–203). Springer. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51103
  • DLV-HEX: Dealing with Semantic Web under Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2005). DLV-HEX: Dealing with Semantic Web under Answer-Set Programming. In R. Mizoguchi (Ed.), Poster & Demonstration Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005) (p. PID 73). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51348
  • NLP-DL: A KR System for Coupling Nonmonotonic Logic Programs with Description Logics / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2005). NLP-DL: A KR System for Coupling Nonmonotonic Logic Programs with Description Logics. In R. Mizoguchi (Ed.), Poster & Demonstration Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005) (p. PID 67). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51347
  • A General Framework for Expressing Preferences in Causal Reasoning and Planning / Delgrande, J. P., Schaub, T., & Tompits, H. (2005). A General Framework for Expressing Preferences in Causal Reasoning and Planning. In S. McIlraith, P. Peppas, & M. Thielscher (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning (COMMONSENSE 2005) (pp. 47–54). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51336
  • A Uniform Integration of Higher-Order Reasoning and External Evaluations in Answer -Set Programming / Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Schindlauer, R., & Tompits, H. (2005). A Uniform Integration of Higher-Order Reasoning and External Evaluations in Answer -Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05) (pp. 90–96). Professional Book Center. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51276
  • On Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming / Eiter, T., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). On Solution Correspondences in Answer-Set Programming. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-05) (pp. 97–102). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51105
  • Strong and Uniform Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming: Characterizations and Complexity Results for the Non-Ground Case / Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., & Woltran, S. (2005). Strong and Uniform Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming: Characterizations and Complexity Results for the Non-Ground Case. In Proceedings, The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Seventeenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, (pp. 695–700). AAAI Press / The MIT Press 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/51104
  • Test and Comparison Results / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Tompits, H. (2005). Test and Comparison Results. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/33055
  • Self-assessment Report for Years 3+4 / Eiter, T., Fink, M., & Tompits, H. (2005). Self-assessment Report for Years 3+4. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12708/33054

2004

2003

2002

2000